ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Knoevenagel Condensations Catalyzed by New Oil Shale Recyclable Catalyst at Room Temperature and Assisted by Ultrasounds Irradiations

Elmustapha Ennesyry1, Fathallaah Bazi1*, Bahija Mounir1, M’hammed Elkouali1, Hassan Hannache2, Mohammed Talbi1 and Mohammed Hamza1

1Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Physico-Chemistry of Materials (LCAPCM), Faculty of Science Ben M’sick, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Boulevard Cdt Driss Harti, BP.7955, Ben M'sik, Casablanca, Morocco.

2Thermostructural Materials and Polymers Team (LIMAT), Faculty of Science Ben M’sick, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Boulevard Cdt Driss Harti, BP.7955, Ben M'sick, Casablanca, Morocco.

Corresponding Author E-mail: fathallaah.bazi@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/370604

Article Publishing History
Article Received on : 09-Oct-2021
Article Accepted on :
Article Published : 22 Nov 2021
Article Metrics
Article Review Details
Reviewed by: Dr. Kamisah D. Pandiangan
Second Review by: Dr. Benu Arora
Final Approval by: Dr. Rafid S. Dawood
ABSTRACT:

Functionalized alkenes were successfully synthesized via a clean procedure in a short time by using a new recycled heterogeneous catalyst prepared from Moroccan oil shale, this catalyst is characterized by different technics such XRD, BET-BJH, MEB-EDS, and TGA, before it’s has been used in the Knoevenagel condensation between different aldehydes and active methylenes. The results showed that coupling the catalyst with ultrasound irradiations could improve the catalytic system in this transformation by achieving the products in a very short time, the results showed clearly that this catalyst could be considered as excellent recyclable support in Knoevenagel condensation.

KEYWORDS:

Heterogeneous catalysis; Knoevenagel; Oil Shale; Ultrasound

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Ennesyry E, Bazi F, Mounir B, Elkouali M, Hannache H, Talbi M, Hamza M. Knoevenagel Condensations Catalyzed by New Oil Shale Recyclable Catalyst at Room Temperature and Assisted by Ultrasounds Irradiations. Orient J Chem 2021;37(6).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Ennesyry E, Bazi F, Mounir B, Elkouali M, Hannache H, Talbi M, Hamza M. Knoevenagel Condensations Catalyzed by New Oil Shale Recyclable Catalyst at Room Temperature and Assisted by Ultrasounds Irradiations. Orient J Chem 2021;37(6). Available from: https://bit.ly/3HIHN43


Introduction Since the first report of Knoevenagel condensation in 1895, the synthesis of their products is becoming and still guard an important position in the scale of organic transformations knowing that it is considered as indispensable intermediates in many organic reactions 1. This transformation is getting its importance from the capability of the generation of double bond carbon-carbon from condensation between carbonyls and active methylene compounds to afford the desired functionalized alkenes.

The products synthesized by Knoevenagel condensation are widely used in the synthesis of reaction intermediates or as final products themselves for pharmaceutical uses, perfumes and polymers 2,3, bioactive compounds like pesticides, antifungal products, and anti-bacterial 4,5. The functionalized alkenes obtained by Knoevenagel reaction also have broad medicinal activities such as antiviral, anti-tubercular, anti-Parkinson, anti-diabetic, anti-oxidant, and anti-cancer activity 6-12.

Too many catalysts have been reported since the first synthesis of Knoevenagel condensation which was catalyzed by diethylamine 13 and showed then that this transformation needs a basic catalyst. In this regard, researchers developed many basic catalysts which could generate this transformation such as metal oxides such mesoporous Mg–Fe bi-metal oxides and Fly ash supported calcium oxide 14,15, Metal-organic framework 16-18, phosphates catalysts 19,20, Dolomite 21, alkali metal hydroxide such LiOH 21 and a limited variety of acid catalysts were also reported, we mentioned in this regard polymer-metal complex PS-TiCl4 23 and Nano-crystalline HoCrO4 24.

Ultrasounds assisted heterogeneous catalysts have become a more attractive way to ameliorate catalytic systems in many transformations by its rapidity and high reaction yields under eco-friendly conditions, this sonor technic has proved also its capability to ameliorate catalytic systems toward Knoevenagel condensation, a variety of catalysts were used under ultrasound conditions to achieve Knoevenagel products such alkaline-doped saponites 25 Potassium sorbate 26 and KF/Al2O3 27.

On the other hand, oil shale considering as a source of energy by conversion the raw oil shale to energy and chemical products by the thermochemical conversion technology 28, many environmental alternatives were also developed by using Moroccan oil shale as an adsorbent material to remove industrial colorant, heavy metals and radioactive elements 28-37.

On our part, we will broaden and develop for the first time the application of oil shale raw material by elaboration of a new stable and recyclable heterogeneous catalyst and investigate its catalytic activity toward Knoevenagel condensation using different aldehydes with active methylenes to achieve high valued intermediate compounds of functionalized alkenes either at room temperature or under ultrasound irradiations Schema 1.

Scheme 1: Knoevenagel condensation in the presence of the catalyst.

Click here to View scheme

Materials and methods

Materials

The raw material of oil shale supplied from the region of Tarfaya morocco, the sample which was used as supports is crushed and sieved in particles between (50-200 microns), and the catalyst is obtained by calcination in air at 900°C for 2 hours, the obtained catalyst was analyzed by X-ray diffraction using (Philips diffractometer 1710), using Cu-Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) with 2θ range from 10 to 80. The thermal evolution of the sample was monitored from ambient temperature to 800°C by heating rate 10°C/min under an inert atmosphere using TGA Verstherme (Thermoscientific), the morphology of the catalyst was examined using a scanning microscope HIROX S4000.

The N2 adsorption-desorption of the catalyst was measured using a 3Flex Micromeritics instrument. The data were processed by the 3Flex Software version 4.01. Specific surface area and pores size distributions were calculated according to Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation and Barrett-JoynerHalenda (BJH) method respectively. The isolated products were identified using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (151, MHz) recorded on an NMR spectrometer JNM-ECZ500R/S1 FT NMR SYSTEM (JEOL) using trichloromethane as a solvent.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of the functionalized alkenes

Equimolar mixture (1.5 mmol) of different aldehydes and active methylene, specific weight of catalyst was added in a volume of solvent at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred using a magnetic stirrer or assisted with ultrasound. After completion of the reaction the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate to give the product which is purified by simple recrystallization in ethanol, the catalyst recovered off by simple filtration, and the formed alkenes identified by their melting points, infrared spectroscopy, and 1H NMR, 13C NMR.

The recovered catalyst was washed with methanol, then dried and calcined at 900°C for 30 minutes before the re-utilization.

Results and discussion

Catalyst characterization

After the preparation of the catalyst, it’s has been characterized by different analytical technics. At first, we aimed to visualize the morphology of its surface the things which was conducted by scanning electron microscopy Fig.1.

Figure 1: SEM-EDS of the catalyst

Click here to View figure 

The micrographs show us clearly that the morphology is represented by the heterogeneous dispersion of surface grains. These micrographs also evince a porous structure of the catalyst, which represents a good and promoted sign for using it as a catalyst. Furthermore, the elemental analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) indicates the presence of C, O, Ca, and Mg as main elements.

The XRD spectrum of the catalyst Fig.2, represents a mixture of different phases, the pattern reveals the presence of Ca and Mg oxides, CaO (2θ= 32, 37, 54 and 64) and MgO (2θ= 37, 43 and 62) which have been identified due to calcination process, other oxides have been found such silica SiO2 (2θ=21, 26 and 50) and alumina Al2O3. Other different oxides have been reported at a state of traces such as Fe2O3, K2O, Na2O, and P2O5.

Figure 2: XRD pattern of the catalyst

Click here to View figure 

To confirm the thermal stability of the catalyst, we conducted a TGA analysis Fig3. This analysis showed us that there are two main weight losses. The first corresponds to a small weight loss of water molecules, and the second, at 600°C, could represent the decomposition of the carbonates which are still present in the support. These results show that this catalyst is thermally stable.

Figure 3: Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) of the catalyst

Click here to View figure

The pattern of a typical IUPAC type IV with a hysteresis loop showed us that the catalyst has a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area (SBET) of 3.313 m2 g-1 and total volume pore 0.004440 cm³/g Fig.4a. Furthermore, the corresponding pores size distributions curve determined by Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method which showed that the pore size distribution is centered approximately 25.20 Å Fig.4b.

Figure 4: Nitrogen Adsorption-desorption isotherms of the catalyst (a) and BJH pore size distribution (b).

Click here to View figure 

Catalytic Activity

First, we inaugurated the catalytic investigation by studying the effect of the catalytic weight on the yield of the product using benzaldehyde and ethyl cyanoacetate as a model reaction at room temperature for 120 minutes, a yield of 67 was achieved. The raising of the reaction time to 180 minutes allowed us to achieve a very significant increase in the yield by getting a yield of 92% Fig.5.

Figure 5: Influence of catalytic weight and reaction time on the yield of the reaction

Click here to View figure 

To ameliorate the catalytic activity of the catalyst toward Knoevenagel condensation, we combined it with ultrasound irradiations. The tests were carried out in ultrasounds bath with no agitation. Different parameters have been studied, such as catalyst weight, nature and volume of solvent, and the kinetic of the reaction.

Initially, we optimized the reaction conditions for the synthesis of ethyl benzilidencyanoacetate as a reaction model product by the investigation of the influence of different parameters under ultrasound irradiation. In the first instance, 0.1 g of the catalyst was found to be the optimum catalytic weight to realize this transformation.

Regarding ultrasound-assisted organic synthesis, the nature of the solvent plays an important role either by lowering the viscosity of the medium or by making it uniform and miscible [38]. In this regard, we evaluated different polar primary and secondary alcohols as solvents on the yield of the reaction, such as Et-OH, Me-OH , Pr-OH , Bu-OH , Hex-OH , iso-Bu , and iso-Pr (Table 1).

Table 1: Influence of different solvents on the yield.

Solvent

Yield %

Methanol

63

Ethanol

46

Propanol

46

Butanol

45

i-propanol

39

i-Butanol

40

Hexanol

33

 

The results which are shown in table 1 give us a clear vision that the reaction could be carried out by using different alcohols as solvents. It is noteworthy that the best yield was obtained when we used methanol as a solvent. This result could be explained by the low viscosity of methanol, the thing which makes it easier for the cavitation phenomena created by ultrasound irradiations [38]. This explanation takes more credibility when we compare the results of methanol with other solvents with higher viscosity.

The optimization in Table 2 showed that 0.2 ml of methanol was found to be sufficient to carry out this reaction in a good yield by obtaining 66% of the desired product. The augmentation of the solvent volume to 1 ml decreased the yield to 40%. This result is explained by the dispersion of reagents and, by consequence, limiting the contact surface-substrates. 

The optimum reaction time was found via the kinetic study when we got a satisfying yield of 75% after 45 minutes. After this time, the yield stayed the same.

Table 2: Reaction Optimization Condition under ultrasounds irradiations.

Entry

Amount of catalyst

Time

Solvent Volume

Yield%

1

0.05

30

Methanol, 0.5ml

30

2

0.1

30

Methanol, 0.5ml

66

3

0.15

30

Methanol, 0.5ml

65

4

0.2

30

Methanol, 0.5ml

65

5

0.1

15

Methanol,0.2ml

50

6

0.1

30

Methanol,0.2ml

63

7

0.1

45

Methanol,0.2ml

75

8

0.1

60

Methanol,0.2ml

75

According to these findings summarized in Table 2, the optimum reaction conditions using ultrasound, irradiations were found to be 0.1 g of catalyst, 0.2 ml of methanol as the minimal quantity of solvent which could accelerate the reaction, and 45 minutes as the reaction time.

The recyclability of the catalyst has been studied. This feature is considered the most important advantage when it comes to heterogeneous catalysts. The recovered catalyst was washed with methanol and treated thermally at 900°C for 30 minutes before reuse. This treatment showed its efficiency by giving the catalyst the capability of reuse several times without a significant decrease in the yield Fig.6.

Figure 6: Reusability of the catalyst in the synthesis of Ethyl 2-cyano-3-phenylacrylate

Click here to View figure

Various alkenes were prepared using the optimized conditions at room temperature and under ultrasound irradiation Table 3. The comparison of the obtained results at room temperature and the ultrasound method demonstrates that the ultrasonic approach is very effective for this transformation. The reaction time decreases significantly to 1 minute in some entries, as presented in the table.

The results showed that the use of ethyl cyanoacetate as active methylene (Table 1, entry 1,2,3), gives the desired products in a very good yield but at a time goes from 60 until 180 minutes. These conditions are enhanced when we use the ultrasound method when the time of the reaction decreases.

Carrying out the reaction by using the malonitrile as a starter active methylene which is considered more active than ethyl cyanoacetate leads to the desired alkenes in good yields and a very short time of 1 minute (Table 1, entry 4,5,6,7,8).

Table 3: Generalization of synthesis of different alkenes by Knoevenagel reaction

Click here to View table

Conclusion

An investigation of Knoevenagel condensation between active methylenes and different aldehydes was conducted using a new recyclable catalyst elaborated for the first time from Moroccan oil shale. This new catalyst showed many advantages such as high catalytic activity compared to the reported catalysts, reusability several times, and easy separation procedure all that under mild reaction conditions. We also demonstrated that this new catalyst could be efficiently coupled with ultrasound irradiations to produce the desired products in a short period with high yields.

Acknowledgement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Sources

There are no funding Source.

References

  1. Van Beurden, K.; de Koning, S.; Molendijk, D.; & van Schijndel, J. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews. 2020, 13(4), 349-364.
    CrossRef
  2. Van Schijndel, J.; Molendijk, D.; van Beurden, K.; Canalle, L. A.; Noël, T.;  Meuldijk, J.. European Polymer Journal. 2020, 125, 109534.
    CrossRef
  3. Van Schijndel, J.; Molendijk, D.; van Beurden, K.; Vermeulen, R.; Noël, T.; & Meuldijk, J. Journal of Polymer Science. 2020, 58(12), 1655-1663
    CrossRef
  4. Heravi, M. M.; Janati, F.; & Zadsirjan, V. s. Monatshefte für Chemie. 2020, 151(4), 439-482.
    CrossRef
  5. Ezer, M.; Yıldırım, L. T.; Bayro, O.; Verspohl, E. J.; & Dundar, O. B. Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry. 2012, 27(3), 419-427.
    CrossRef
  6. Barnes, D. M.; Haight, A. R.; Hameury, T.; McLaughlin, M. A.; Mei, J.; Tedrow, J. S.; & Toma, J. D. R. Tetrahedron. 2006, 62(49) , 11311-11319.
    CrossRef
  7. Kim, S.; Kim, E.; & Hong, J. H. Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids. 2015, 34(3), 163-179.
    CrossRef
  8. Ugwu, D. I.; Ezema, B. E.; Eze, F. U.; & Ugwuja, D. I. International journal of medicinal chemistry. 2014.
    CrossRef
  9. Unlusoy, M. C.; Kazak, C.; Bayro, O.; Verspohl, E. J.; Ertan, R.; & Dundar, O. B. Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry. 2013, 28(6) , 1205-1210.
    CrossRef
  10. Molnar, M.; Brahmbhatt, H.; Rastija, V.; Pavić, V.; Komar, M.; Karnaš, M., & Babić, J. Molecules. 2018, 23(8), 1897.
    CrossRef
  11. Ali, I.; Haque, A.; Saleem, K.; & Hsieh, M. F. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2013, 21(13) ,3808-3820.
    CrossRef
  12. Asati, V.; Mahapatra, D. K.; & Bharti, S. K. Thiazolidine-2, 4-diones as multi-targeted scaffold in medicinal chemistry. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2014, 87, 814-833.
    CrossRef
  13. Knoevenagel, E. Chemische Berichte. 1894, 27, 2345–2346.
    CrossRef
  14. Gao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Cui, F.; Zhu, Y.; Hua, Z.; & Shi, J. Dalton Transactions. 2010, 39(46), 11132-11135.
    CrossRef
  15. Jain, D.; Khatri, C.; & Rani, A. Fuel Processing Technology. 2010 , 91(9) , 1015-1021.
    CrossRef
  16. Parmar, B.; Patel, P.; Murali, V.; Rachuri, Y.; Kureshy, R. I.; Noor-ul, H. K., & Suresh, E. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers. 2018, 5(10), 2630-2640.
    CrossRef
  17. Cai, K.; Tan, W.; Zhao, N.; & He, H. Crystal Growth & Design. 2020, 20(7),4845-4851.
    CrossRef
  18. Tom, L.; & Kurup, M. R. P. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2021, 294 , 121846.
    CrossRef
  19. Sebti, S.; Smahi, A.; & Solhy, A. Tetrahedron letters.2002, 43(10), 1813-1815.
    CrossRef
  20. Sebti, S.; Tahir, R.; Nazih, R.; Saber, A.; & Boulaajaj, S. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2002 , 228(1-2) ,155-159.
    CrossRef
  21. Yang, H.; Dong, H.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, G.; Wang, P.; & Liu, Q. Catalysis Letters. 2019, 149(3), 778-787.
    CrossRef
  22. Pasha, M. A.; & Manjula, K. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2011, 15(3), 283-286.
    CrossRef
  23. Rahmatpour, A.;  Goodarzi, N. Catalysis Communications. 2019, 124, 24-31.
    CrossRef
  24. Burange, A. S.; Tugaonkar, P. S.; Thakur, S. D.; Khan, R. R.; & Shukla, R. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2020, 23, 100493.
    CrossRef
  25. Martín‐Aranda, R. M.; Ortega‐Cantero, E.; Rojas‐Cervantes, M. L.; Vicente‐Rodríguez, M. A.;  Bañares‐Muñoz, M. A. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 2005, 80(2), 234-238.
    CrossRef
  26. Liu, Q.; Ai, H.;  Li, Z. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2011, 18(2), 477-479.
    CrossRef
  27. Wang, S. X.; Li, J. T.; Yang, W. Z.; & Li, T. S. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2002, 9(3), 159-161.
    CrossRef
  28. Cheikh Moine, E.; Groune, K.; El Hamidi, A.; Khachani, M.; Halim, M.; & Arsalane, S. Energy. 2016, 115, 931-941.
    CrossRef
  29. Oumam, M. ; Abourriche, A. ; Adil, A. ; Hannache, H. ; Pailler, R. ; Naslain, R. ; Puillot, J. P.. 2003, 28(4),  59-74.
  30. Miyah, Y.; Idrissi, M.; Lahrichi, A.;  Zerrouq, F. Oil shale. 2014, 3(8). 
  31. Elhammoudi, N.; Oumam, M.; & Mansouri, S. International Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2018, 16(2) , 1-10.
    CrossRef
  32. Elhammoudi, N.; Oumam, M.; Mansouri, S.; Abourriche, A.; Chham, A. I.; & Hannache, H. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 2018 ,9(5A) , 26455-26464
  33. Khouya, E.; Fakhi, S.; Hannache, H.; Abbe, J. C.; Andres, Y.; Naslain, R.; Nourredine, A. Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry. 2004 , 260(1) , 159-166. 
    CrossRef
  34. Khouya, E.; Fakhi, S.; Hannache, H.; Ichcho, S.; Pailler, R.; Naslain, R.; & Abbe, J. C. In Journal de Physique IV . 2005, 123 , 87-93.
    CrossRef
  35. Khouya, E. H.; Legrouri, K.; Fakhi, S.; & Hannache, H. Nature Precedings. 2010, 1-1.
  36. Oumam, M.; Abourriche, A. ; Mansouri, S. ; Mouiya, M. ; Benhammou, A. ; Abouliatim, Y. ;  Naslain, R.  Oil Shale. 2020, 37(2) , 139-157.
    CrossRef
  37. Abourriche, A. ; Oumam, M. ; Mouiya, M. ; Mansouri, S. ; Benhammou, A. ; El Hafiane, Y. ;  Hannache, H. Combined Application of Physico-Chemical & Microbiological Processes for Industrial Effluent Treatment Plant Springer, Singapore. 2020, 187-204.
    CrossRef
  38. Gharat, N. N.; & Rathod, V. K. Green Sustainable Process for Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Science. 2020.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

About The Author