ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Rapid Determination of Tellurium in Tellurium-Containing Organic Compounds by Microwave Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectrometry

Anastasia V. Lastovka1,2, Valentina P. Fadeeva1,2, Maksim A. Bazhenovand Vera D. Tikhova1

1N. N. Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (NIOCH SB RAS), 9 Lavrentiev Ave., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.

2Novosibirsk National Research State University, 1 Pirogova Str., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.

Corresponding Author E-mail: maxbajenoff@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/330612

Article Publishing History
Article Received on :
Article Accepted on :
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

А method for quantitative tellurium measurement in tellurium-containing organic compounds (TOC) by a microwave plasma–atomic emission spectrometer Agilent 4100 has been suggested. One of ways to decompose the sample — the oxygen flask combustion or the acid decomposition in a heating block — can be applied. It has been demonstrated with telluradiazole derivatives and some other TOC with 20 to 58% tellurium content that the method proposed is suitable for precise and easy determination of tellurium. Elements such as nitrogen, sulfur, potassium, selenium present in the TOC do not prevent from determining tellurium. The relative error of the analysis is 1—5%.

KEYWORDS:

Tellurium-Containing Organic Compounds; Sample Decomposition; Microwave Plasma — Atomic Emission Spectrometry; Agilent 4100

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Lastovka A. V, Fadeeva V. P, Bazhenov M. A, Tikhova V. D. Rapid Determination of Tellurium in Tellurium-Containing Organic Compounds by Microwave Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectrometry. Orient J Chem 2017;33(6).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Lastovka A. V, Fadeeva V. P, Bazhenov M. A, Tikhova V. D. Rapid Determination of Tellurium in Tellurium-Containing Organic Compounds by Microwave Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectrometry. Orient J Chem 2017;33(6). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=39683


Introduction

Chemistry of tellurium organic compounds (TOC) has intensively been developing in recent decades. The increased interest in this field is due to widely use of these substances as catalysts in organic reactions (e. g. rubber vulcanization), inhibitors of metal corrosion, insecticides, fungicides, components of special photographic materials, pharmaceuticals, etc.1–5.

In view of great practical importance of these compounds for science and technology, a large number of analytical methods for the determination of tellurium in various objects were developed: gravimetric methods based on the precipitation of elemental tellurium by treating with inorganic and organic reducing agents6–8; titrimetric methods based on redox reactions using iodide-anion, salts of iron(II), chromium(II) or titanium(III) as reducing agents, as well as potassium permanganate or dichromate as oxidizing agents for Te(IV)9–11; electrochemical methods, which allow one to determine the tellurium and selenium at simultaneous presence with a sensitivity being 10–5 M12,13; spectrophotometric methods based on the formation of complexes with sulfur-containing organic reagents (diethyldithiocarbamate, thiurea and their derivatives, bismuthiol II, and so on)14,15 or on the formation of ion pairs of tellurium acido complexes with organic bases – pyrazolone derivatives and rhodamine dyes16,17.

Three spectrophotometric methods were used to determine small tellurium content in the environment (water, plant material, soil), and thin telluride films18.These methods are based on the formation of three differently colored Te-complexes. Magenta color was obtained by oxidation of 4-bromophenyl-hydrazine by tellurium in a basic medium followed by condensation of the product with N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride. Red color was obtained by oxidation of 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone hydrochloride followed by condensation with the chromotropic acid. Orange color was obtained by oxidation of 2,3‑dimethoxystrichnidin-10-one in an acid medium. Beer’s law was obeyed in the range of 1.0—25 mg/mLfor magenta product, 0.7—20 mg/mL for red, and 0.3—15 mg/mL for orange. The authors noted that these methods were simpler and more sensitive than the other known ones, and standard deviations were 0.2—0.3%.

Several dyes were proposed for the extraction-photometric determination of tellurium: Victoria blue 4R, Brilliant green, Rhodamine 4C. The latter dye was used, for example, in the analyses of tellurium salt solutions and semiconductor films19. The extraction-photometric redox process was described for the selective determination of selenium(IV) and tellurium(IV) with the detection limit of 5ž105 mg/L, based on different oxidability of analytes by antimony(V) ion associates in acidic or alkaline media20. The method does not require either preconcentrating and separating analytes, or masking the associated components in analyte mixtures.

The possibility of using benzal green as a reagent for the rapid determination of tellurium(IV) is shown by Amelin et al.21 The dye was immobilized on viscose fabrics and it formed ion associate with molibdotellurous heteropolyacid with different color intensity. The range of detectable concentrations is 0.01–0.1 mg/L of Te(IV).

Currently, spectrometric methods are most commonly used for the tellurium determination. Atomic absorption spectrometry was used in the analysis of geological samples (ores, minerals, rocks) with tellurium content 0.01–100 mg/g22, coal23, in lead and lead alloys24, in the environment (water, plants, biological materials)25–27. Such techniques as atomic emission spectrometry (AES) with inductively coupled (ICP) or microwave (MP) plasma, in conjunction with mass spectrometry28–31, atomic fluorescence spectrometry 32–34, the optical emission spectrometry35 are used for the tellurium and tellurium trace analysis in various objects. In most of these works, tellurium is converted to the hydride before the spectrometric measurements to increase the sensitivity of the method. The atomic emission method with continuous hydride generation was used for the simultaneous determination of Sb, As, Bi, Ge, Se, and Te in a set of sediment samples36. The detection limit for Te was 6.5 µg/L.

The tellurium determination was made in the gold concentrate by ICP-AES37. It was shown that tellurium may be separated from the majority of interfering components (such as Ag, Pb, Zn, Si, Ca, Mg, Al, Fe) in the sample by coprecipitation with arsenic to eliminate the matrix effect. The detection limit of Te was 4.23 µg/g.

Doronina et al.38 investigated the possibility of group preconcentration of As, Cd, Se, and Te for the subsequent simultaneous determination of these elements by ICP-AES in the technogenic raw materials. Sorption of arsenic, selenium, tellurium, and cadmium oxyanions on iron, lanthanum, and magnesium hydroxides was used. The relative standard deviation of the method was 9–2.5% under the content of determined elements from 104 to 10% mass. It was found that the presence of iron (> 500 µg/mL) can lead to 10% decrease of the Te (214.2 nm) signal.

When new organotellurium compounds are synthesized they should be completely described. It requires quantitative determination of so-called basic biogenic elements (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen) as well as tellurium. Unlike small tellurium content in the above-mentioned inorganic, biological and ecological objects of analysis, tellurium content in synthetic TOC may be up to tens of percent. The first necessary step in TOC analysis is a complete decomposition of organic matter. In the few published studies on the analysis of TOC, they used wet decomposition in mineral acids39–41, burning in a stream of oxygen at 900—­950°C or the oxygen flask combustion42,43. Afterwards, tellurium was determined by the methods of gravimetry42, potentiometry40, spectrophotometry41,43. The main disadvantages of all these methods are their long duration and tediousness. MP-AES method for the determination of tellurium in TOC has not previously been used, although it is characterized by high accuracy and selectivity, rapidity, efficiency, wide range of detectable concentrations, and it does not involve converting tellurium into a single analytical form.

The goals of this work are finding the conditions for sample preparation (decomposition) and developing a procedure for quantitative determination of tellurium in synthetic multielement tellurium-containing organic compounds by MP-AES using the Agilent 4100 spectrometer.

Experimental

Instruments

Analysis was performed with Agilent 4100 MP-AES (Australia) microwave plasma — atomic emission spectrometer. The sample supply system was a self-adjusted one-piece quartz torch. Plasma was generated by igniting with auxiliary argon and maintained with nitrogen. The configuration of the plasma was vertically-oriented with axial observation and computer-control of the plasma viewing position. A Curny-Terner monochromator, self-adjusted, with a 600 mm focal length was used. Holographic gitter with 2400 lines/mm was used. The spectral range was 178—780 nm and spectral resolution was 0.050 nm. A High-speed CCD detector, having 532 × 128 pixels, with a quantum efficiency of >90% was used; it was cooled to 0 °С with a Peltier element. A double-pass glass cyclonic spray chamber and a One-Neb micronebulizer were used.

Hot BlockTM Digestion System (25-Well 100 ml) Agilent 4107 (Australia) was applied for acid decomposition of organic samples.

The samples and reagents were weighed with Mettler Toledo AT20 (Switzerland) microanalytical balance and Sartorius CP224S (Germany) analytical balance.

Reagents and Materials

Solutions of H2O2, KNO3, HCl, HNO3 (Reakhim, Russia) were prepared from reagent-grade and high-purity chemicals. Oxygen gas from a cylinder with a purity of 99.7% was used for burning. The specimen holder was made of platinum wire (Ø = 0.6—1.0 mm) with a purity of 99.99%. Blue ribbon ash-free filters were cut into 3 × 3 cm squares with 1‑cm branches, impregnated with a saturated KNO3 solution and dried; an H-type polyethylene film; glycerol, polyurethane foam, twice-distilled water.

Reference Material

Certified reference material of tellurium(IV) ions — Interstate Certified Reference Material 0529:2003 (GSO 6082-91) (Russia).

Results and Discussion

In the furtherance of maintained goals, our work was performed as follows: choosing an analytical wavelength, finding suitable reference material of Te for constructing calibration curve, condition selection for decomposition of samples, making measurements. Below we briefly describe general observations.

Analytical Wavelength Selection

Сomparative measurements of the Te standard solutions were made at three wavelengths: 214.281; 225.902; 238.578 nm. The calibration curves were constructed followed by measurement of the Te solution (5 ppm) (Table 1).

It is clear from Table 1 that only two emission lines are appropriate for the measurements. Atomic line 214.281 nm was selected due to its maximal intensity, but the measurement at this wavelength should be carried out after the full nitrogen purge of monochromator. Although this emission line is influenced by vanadium, tantalum, and cadmium, however, such elements are not encountered in the studied synthetic organic compounds.

Table 1: The results of determining 5 ppm Te at three emission lines (P = 0.95; n = 7)

λ, nm

214.281

225.902

238.578

I, rel.

4885.9

1147.2

2127.8

the equation of the calibration curve

565.81 ci  – 3.46

(80.98 ci) / (1 – 0.04 ci)

201.37 ci – 4.81

approximation

linear

rational

linear

r (correlation coefficient)

1.00000

1.00000

0.99999

Found Te, ppm

5.04±0.02

4.33±0.11

5.08±0.04

 

The Study of Sample Decomposition

A tellurium-containing organic compound, 3,4‑dicyano-1,2,5-telluradiazole (C4N4Te), was used to study the methods of sample preparation. Composition and structure of this substance are confirmed by elemental analysis, NMR, IR and MS spectrometry. The purity of the compound is 99.9%.

When using the oxygen flask combustion, we tested three different solutions for absorbing the combustion products: 1) 10 mL of 0.1 M HCl; 2) 3 mL of HNO3 (conc.) + 5 mL H2O + 2 mL H2O2; 3) 10 mL of HNO3 (conc.). The best results were obtained with absorbing mixtures 1) and 3).

When using the decomposition mixture with nitric acid and perhydrol (8 mL HNO3 (conc.) + 2 mL of 30% H2O2) to resolve samples in the heating block, we experimentally selected the temperature of the reaction (from 60 to 130°C) and the duration (45 to 60 min) of the process. Finally, satisfactory results were obtained after decomposition of the sample for one hour at 130°C.

The following results were obtained in the discussed conditions (P = 0.95; n = 6): with the oxygen flask combustion — 55.5±1.7%; with the acid decomposition in the heating block — 55.5±0.3%. The calculated tellurium content in 3,4-dicyano-1,2,5-tellurodiazole is 55.1%. Therefore, both methods can be used to decompose the TOC when analyzing tellurium.

Procedures for the Decomposition of TOC

The Oxygen Flask Combustion

A portion of 0.1M HCl (10 mL) was placed into a 500-mL Erlenmeyer’s flask which was filled with oxygen from a cylinder. A weighed quantity of a tellurium-containing compound (~2.0—3.0 mg) wrapped into a small square of a potassium nitrate-impregnated ash-free filter with a piece of polyethylene film was fixed on a Pt wire; the branch of the filter was ignited, placed into the flask, and burned. After the combustion having been completed, the flask was thoroughly shaken for 5 min and placed into a fridge for 40 min to complete the absorption of combustion products.

The Acid Decomposition in a Heating Block

A weighed quantity of a tellurium-containing compound (~2.0—3.0 mg) was placed into polypropylene 100 mL vessel. HNO3 (8 mL) and 30% H2O2 (2 mL) were added to the probe. The vessel was covered with a lid (not tightly) and placed in a heating block HotBlockTM Digestion System, Agilent 4107. It took 60 min at 130 oC to complete decomposition of the substance.

After the decomposition, the inside of the flask or vessel was quantitatively transferred into a 100-mL volumetric flask rinsing its walls, stopper, wire or lid with twice-distilled water, and diluted to the mark. The tellurium content in the resulting solution was determined by MP AES using a preliminarily constructed calibration curve.

Construction of Calibration Curves

The calibration curve was made using the solutions obtained with dilution of Certified reference material of tellurium(IV) ions (GSO 6082-91). We used 4 concentrations of Te(IV): 1, 5, 10, 15 ppm. The intensity of Te emission line at 214.241 nm was recorded on the spectrometer. The data were processed with the Agilent MP Expert software (version 1.4.0.4317). The conditions of measurements on the spectrometer were as follows: pressure in the spray chamber was 100 kPa, uptake delay — 15 s, read time — 3 s, stabilization time — 15 s, pump speed — 15 ppm, number of replicates — 3, automatic background correction. A linear intensity dependence of the recorded signal (r ≥ 0.99998) was observed for reference substance solutions in this concentration range.

Various tellurium-containing organic compounds have been analyzed according to the developed technique (Table 2).

Table 2: Results of tellurium determination in TOC using two methods of sample preparation (P = 0.95, n = 5) Table 2: Results of tellurium determination in TOC using two methods of sample preparation (P = 0.95, n = 5)

Click here to View table

 

Conclusion

We have proposed the rapid, accurate and cost-effective technique for the tellurium determination in synthetic multielement organic compounds. It involves the oxygen flask combustion or acid decomposition followed by measuring Te content by the MP-AES method. Elements such as nitrogen, sulfur, potassium, selenium included in the TOC do not influence the quantitative determination of tellurium. Statistical processing was performed on the results obtained by the decomposition of 5—6 weighed portions for each of substances analyzed. The relative error is in the range of 1—5%.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. Andrey V. Zibarev and employees of the Laboratory of Heterocyclic Compounds (NIOCH SB RAS) for the samples provided for our study.

References

  1. Comasseto, J.; Barrientos-Astigarraga, R. Aldrichimica Acta. 2000, 33, 66—102.
  2. Petragrani, N.; Stefani, H. A. Tetrahedron. 2005, 61, 1613—1679.
    CrossRef
  3. Petragrani, N; Stefani, H. A. Tellurium in Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, 2007.
  4. Princival, J.; Dos Santos, A.; Comasseto, J. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2010, 21, 2042—2054.
    CrossRef
  5. Wei, Cao; Lu, Wang; Huaping, Xu. Nano Today. 2015, 10, 717—736.
    CrossRef
  6. Wang, J.; Cheng, K. Microchem J. 1970, 15, 607—621.
    CrossRef
  7. Asuero, A. Microchem J. 1979, 24, 217—233.
    CrossRef
  8. Singh, N.; Rastogi, K.; Agrawal, R. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1985, 62, 394—396.
  9. Johnson, R.; Frederickson, D. Anal. Chem. 1952, 24, 866—867.
    CrossRef
  10. Geiersberger, K.; Durst, A. Z. Analyt. Chem. 1952, 135, 11—14.
    CrossRef
  11. Lenher, V.; Wakefield, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1923, 45, 1423—1425.
    CrossRef
  12. Ivanova, Z.; Ignatenko, Е.; Tarasova, V. J. Anal. Chem. 1973, 28, 1980—1984.
  13. Locatelli, C. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 381, 1073—1081.
    CrossRef
  14. Terpinski, E. Analyst. 1988, 113, 1473—1475.
    CrossRef
  15. Yoshida, H.; Taga, M. Talanta. 1966, 13, 185—191.
    CrossRef
  16. Nazarenko, I.; Ermakov, A. Analiticheskaya Chimiya Selena i Tellura (Analytical Chemistry of Selenium and Tellurium). Nauka: Moscow, 1971 (in Russian).
  17. Balogh, I.; Andruch, V. Analyt. Chim. Acta. 1999, 386, 161—167.
    CrossRef
  18. Suvardhan, K.; Krishna, P.; Puttaiah, E.; Chiranjeevi, P. J. Analyt. Chem. 2007, 62, 1032—1039.
    CrossRef
  19. Kish, P.; Balog, I.; Andrukh, V.; Goloib, M. Zh. Anal. Khim. 1990, 45, 915—919 (in Russian).
  20. Sergeev, G.; Shlyapunova, E. Analitika i Kontrol. 2006, 10, 195—199 (in Russian).
  21. Amelin, V.; Koroleva, O. J. Anal. Chem. 2009, 64, 1275—1278.
    CrossRef
  22. Torgov, V.; Vall, G.; Demidova, M.; Yatsenko, V. Chemical Geology. 1995, 124, 101—107.
    CrossRef
  23. Oda, S.; Arikawa, Y. Bunseki Kagaku. 2005, 54, 1033—1037.
    CrossRef
  24. Mesko, M.; Pozebon, D.; Flores, E.; Dressler, V. Analyt. Chim. Acta. 2004, 517, 195—200.
    CrossRef
  25. Najafi, N.; Tavakoli, H.; Alizadeh, R.; Seidi, S. Analyt. Chim. Acta. 2010, 670, 18—23.
    CrossRef
  26. Kaplan, M.; Cerutti, S.; Salonin, J.; Gasguez, J.; Martinez, L. J. of AOAC International. 2005, 88, 1242—1246.
  27. Grotti, M.; Abelmoschi, M.; Soggia, F.; Frache, R. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 375, 242—247.
    CrossRef
  28. Yu, C.; Cai, Q.; Guo, Z.; Yang, Z.; Khoo, S. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376, 236—242.
    CrossRef
  29. de Quadros, D.; Borges, D. Microchem J. 2014, 116, 244—248.
    CrossRef
  30. Yang, G.; Zheng, J.; Tagami, K.; Uchida, S. Talanta. 2013, 116, 181—187.
    CrossRef
  31. Yu, S.; Zhang, H.; Jin, Q. Gaodeng Xuexiao Huaxue Xuebao. 1999, 11, 84—86.
  32. Cava-Montesinos, P.; Cervera, M.; Pastor, A.; de la Guardia, M. Analyt. Chim. Acta. 2003, 481, 291—300.
    CrossRef
  33. Wang, F.; Zhang, G. Appl. Spectr. 2011, 65, 315—319.
    CrossRef
  34. Chen, Y.; Alzahrani, A.; Deng, T.; Belzile, N. Analyt. Chim. Acta. 2016, 905, 42—50.
    CrossRef
  35. Kaplan, M.; Cerutti, S.; Moyano, S.; Olsina, R.; Martinez, L.; Gasquez, I. Instrumentation Sciences&Technology. 2004, 32, 423—431.
    CrossRef
  36. Morrow, A.; Wiltshire, G.; Hursthouse, A. Atomic Spectroscopy. 1997, 18, 23—28.
  37. Zhang, H.; Ni, W.; Xiao, F.; Mao, X.; Yao, M.; Cui, R. Yejin Fenxi / Metallurgical Analysis. 2016, 36, 32—36.
  38. Doronina, M.; Shiryaeva, O.; Filatova, D.; Baranovskaya, V.; Karpov, Yu. Zavodskaya Laboratoriya. Diagnostika Materialov. 2013, 79, 3—7 (in Russian).
  39. Kruse, F.; Sanftner, R.; Suttle, J. Anal. Chem. 1953, 25, 500—502.
    CrossRef
  40. Masson, M. Microchim. Acta. 1976, 65, 399—411.
    CrossRef
  41. Thavornyutikarn, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1973, 51, 237—239.
    CrossRef
  42. Anisimova, G.; Klimova, V. J. Anal. Chem. 1980, 35, 607—609.
  43. Clark, E.; Al-Turaihi, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1976, 118, 55—58.
    CrossRef


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.