ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Facile Synthesis of Aluminosilicate

T.T.Sundaram1*, N.Prasanna2 and P.Jayamurugan1

1Department of Physics, Adhiyamaan College of Engineering, Hosur - 635109,Tamil Nadu,India.

2Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College For Women, Krishnagiri. 635 001,Tamilnadu,India.

Corresponding Author E-mail: sundaramtt@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/320351

Article Publishing History
Article Received on : May 24, 2016
Article Accepted on : June 20, 2016
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

The researchers in need of an ordered mesoporous material research for the original synthetic protocols. The material was synthesized by one step solvo-thermal crystallization method under acidic conditions using non ionic surfactant as the template. The material was characterized by small angle PXRD,FTIR, and SEM-EDS.

KEYWORDS:

Aluminiosilicate; small angle PXRD; FTIR; SEM

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Sundaram T.T, Prasanna N, Jayamurugan P. Facile Synthesis of Aluminosilicate. Orient J Chem 2016;32(3).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Sundaram T.T, Prasanna N, Jayamurugan P. Facile Synthesis of Aluminosilicate. Orient J Chem 2016;32(3). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=17848


Introduction

Though periodic mesoporous silica had been discovered in 1990 [1], or even much earlier [2], this type of materials did not attract much attention until 1992, upon the publication of two groundbreaking papers [3,4] by a group of Mobil’s scientists describing the so-called M41S family of mesoporous silicas. Since then, research on this topic has grown so dramatically that it has developed into a separate field. Remarkable progress has been made in the use of supramolecular templating techniques to synthesize a large variety of periodic inorganic, organic and hybrid mesostructures with tailored framework structures and compositions, pore sizes and architectures, morphologies and surface properties.

Considerable synthesis efforts have been devoted to develop frameworks with pore diameters within the mesoporous range (2–50 nm) because of their possible use as catalysts, host for inclusion compounds and molecular sieves [5]. Use of the nanosized pores of such host materials to confine the growth of guest materials (semiconductors, metals or compounds) has been widely adopted as an attractive method [6]. The dependence of physical properties of materials on their grain size is a well known phenomenon [7, 8]. Due to their small size (1–100 nm), nanoparticles exhibit novel material properties. However, the engineering of materials on the nanometer scale requires new appropriate synthesis approaches which can provide an effective way of controlling the uniformity of particle sizes and prevent agglomeration of the particles.

Another important discovery is the use of ordered nanoporous silica and colloidal crystals to create new periodic mesoporous and macroporous materials, including carbons, polymers, metals, and alloys. Combination of different synthesis approaches such as amphiphile, colloidal crystal or microemulsion templating, micro molding and soft lithography led to materials with hierarchically ordered structures. Significant effort was also devoted to the development of potential applications in adsorption, catalysis, separation, environmental cleanup, drug delivery, sensing and optoelectronics.

With the discovery of silicate-based mesoporous molecular sieves using surfactants as templates [9], a number of research groups have extended this new synthesis strategy to prepare mesoporous AlPOs [10-12] and SAPOs [13–22,27]. Among the most recent developments in this area is the extension of the amphiphile templating techniques to the synthesis of ordered mesoporous organosilicates and the assembly of zeolite seeds.

Material and Methods

Material Synthesis

Ordered mesoporous aluminium silicate was prepared by a combination of surfactant templating, solvo-thermal method, in which nonylphenol was used as a structure-directing agent; anhydrous aluminum chloride and sodium silicate acted as inorganic precursors. In additional mineral acid was added to the synthesis mixture to prevent hydrolysis reaction.

As following, 6.83 g of anhydrous aluminum chloride was added to a 50ml of de-ionsed water and 6.29 g of sodium silicate under vigorous stirring. When the solution became clear, 4ml of nonylphenol was added under stirring into the above solution. The mixture was further stirred for 2 to 2.5h at 140ºC to 150ºC. Finally white powdered solid washed with deionized water, and dried at 110ºC.

Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction measurements were performed in a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation of wavelength 0.15405 nm.  Samples were finely ground before PXRD experiment. Diffraction data were recorded between 2q = 0.5° to 90° at an interval of 0.02° 2q.

Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic investigation was carried out on a Bruker Vector 22 spectrometer using the KBr pellet.SEM-EDS electron microscopy images were obtained using a JEOL JSM-6390 SEM operated at 20 kV. Samples for analysis were prepared by spreading them on a holey carbon film supported on a copper grid. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to investigate the elemental composition of the silicate.

Results and Discussion

SEM study of the Aluminosilicate samples

The surface relief of aluminosilicate is highly heterogeneous due to the coexistence of different aluminosilicate phases together with crystalline and amorphous materials. Crystals of various shapes and size, together with amorphous masses, incorporate into friable grains.

SEM photos taken from as synthesized sample grains are presented in Fig. 1 to provide typical depictions of all the above mentioned crystal types. A nearly homogeneous matrix which is evidenced apart from the clearly visible crystals is attributed to a mixture of meso crystalline phases and amorphous mass [23]. In EDS data (Table 1) shows the material enriched in Al content and Increasing Al content that increase the hydrophilic character of material. Materials with high concentration of Al increase the selectivity as well as adsorption.

Table 1: Elemental composition of material from EDS

Element

(keV)

Mass%

Atom%

K

C  K

0.277

1.34

2.59

3.475

O  K

0.525

29.72

43.19

1.3221

Na K

1.041

1

1.01

0.9924

Al K

1.486

41.31

35.6

1

Si K

1.739

0.77

0.64

1.0148

Cl K

2.621

25.86

16.96

1.3352

Total

100

100

 

FTIR study of the Aluminum silicate samples

FTIR spectra can be very useful in obtaining information about the structure of zeolite minerals [24, 25]. The vibrations in the region 1600–3700 cm-1can be assigned to the presence of zeolitic water. The isolated OH stretching (at 3405 cm-1in the FTIR pattern of synthesized) is attributed to interaction between the water hydroxyl groups present.

The zeolite phases a strong T–O stretching vibration band in the region 1045–1070 cm-1. In synthesized sample this band appears in 1100 cm-1. This band is significant for the estimation of aluminum content in the crystalline framework of aluminosilicate, as it depends on the framework nSi/nAl ratio. Band at 1631 cm-1 corresponds to bending vibration of water molecule that is physisorbed in material surface. Band assignment in 950 cm-1 due to condensed AlO4 and band at 600 cm-1units for AlO6 were interlinked together in material.

Small angle powder X-Ray diffraction provides a measurement pore diameter as long as porosity has a long range repetitive order of material conformed high intense peak at 2q > 2°. [26]

 

Fig.1 SEM images of synthesized aluminosilicate

Figure 1: SEM images of synthesized aluminosilicate

 



Click here to View Figure

 

Fig.2 EDS of synthesized  aluminum silicate

Figure 2: EDS of synthesized  aluminum silicate

 


Click here to View figure

 

 Fig.3 FTIR Spectrum of synthesized aluminosilicate

Figure 3: FTIR Spectrum of synthesized aluminosilicate

 

Click here to View Figure

 

Fig.4 Small angle PXRD

Figure 4: Small angle PXRD



Click here to View Figure

 

Conclusion

The results presented show that we were able to prepare high-quality mesoporous aluminosilicate materials with highly thermal stability. The synthesized material was high Al content increase the activity, number active site and adsorption. As synthesized material better for hydrolysis reaction.It adsorbs moisture from surroundings, so we can be used as a dehydrant and gas sensor applications.

References

  1. Yanagisawa T., Shimizu, T., Kuroda, K. and Kato C: ‘The preparation of Alkyltrimethylammonium-Kanemite complexes and their conversion to mesoporous materials’, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1990, 63,988-992.
    CrossRef
  2. Di Renzo F., Cambo H. and Dutartre R: ‘28-Year old synthesis of micelletemplated mesopoorus silica’, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 1997, 10, 283-286.
    CrossRef
  3. Kresge C.T., Leonowicz M.E., Roth W.J., Vartuli J.C. and Beck J.S: ‘Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism’, Nature, 1992,359,710-712.
    CrossRef
  4. Beck J.S., Vartuli J.C., Roth W.J., Leonowicz M.E., Kresge C.T., Schmitt K.D., Chu, C.T-W., Olson D.H., Sheppard E.W., McCullen S.B., Higgins J.B. and Schlenker J.L : ‘A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates’, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,1992,114,10834-10843.
    CrossRef
  5. Huo Q., Margolese D.L., Stucky G.D.: ‘Surfactant control of phases in the synthesis of mesoporous silica-based materials’, Chem. Mater.,1996, 8,1147- 1160.
    CrossRef
  6. Zhao D., Feng J., Huo Q., Melosh N., Fredrickson G.H., Chmelka B.F., Stucky G.D.: Science.,1998, 279,548.
    CrossRef
  7. Gao T., Meng G., Tian Y., Sun S., Liu X., Zhang L., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter., 2002, 14, 12651.
    CrossRef
  8. Aronson B.B.J., Blanford C., Stein A. :Chem. Mater.,1997, 9, 2842.
    CrossRef
  9. Li J., Nazer L.F.: Chem. Commun., 2000,1749.
    CrossRef
  10. Maschmeyer T., Rey F., Sanker G., Thomas J.M.: Nature (London)., 1997, 378,159.
    CrossRef
  11. Beck J.S., Vartuli J.C., Rith W.J., Leonowicz M.E., Kresge C.T., Schmitt K.D., Chu C.T.W., Olson D.H., Sheppard E.W., McCullen B., Higgins J.B., Schlenker J.L.: J.Am. Chem. Soc.,1992, 114,10834.
    CrossRef
  12. Oliver S., Kuperman A., Coombs N., Lough A., Ozin G.A.:Nature, 1995, 378, 47.
    CrossRef
  13. Oliver S., Coombs N., Ozin G.A.: Adv. Mater. 1995, 7, 931.
    CrossRef
  14. Oliver S., Ozin G.A.: J. Mater. Chem.1998, 8,1081.
    CrossRef
  15. Sayari A., Karra V.R., Reddy J.S., Moudrakovski I.J.: Chem. Commun. 1996, 411.
    CrossRef
  16. Sayari A., Moudrakovski I.J., Reddy J.S.:Chem. Mater.1996, 8, 2080.
    CrossRef
  17. Kimura T., Sugahara Y., Kuroda K.: Chem. Lett.1997, 983.
    CrossRef
  18. Kimura T., Sugahara Y., Kuroda K.: Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 1998, 22,115.
    CrossRef
  19. Kimura T., Sugahara Y., Kuroda K.: Chem. Commun. 1998,559.
    CrossRef
  20. Kimura T., Sugahara Y., Kuroda K.: Chem. Mater.,1999, 11.,508.
    CrossRef
  21. Zhao D., Luan Z., Kevan L.: Chem. Commun. 1997 1009.
    CrossRef
  22. Luan Z., Zhao D., He H., Klinowski J., Kevan L., J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102., 1250.
    CrossRef
  23. Kadlecikova M., Breza J., Jesenak K., Pastorkova K., Luptakova V., Kolmacka M., Vojackova A., Michalka M., Vavra I., Krizanova Z.,: Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 5073.
    CrossRef
  24. Zhao D., Cleare K., Oliver C., Ingram C., Cook D., Szostak R., Kevan L.: Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1998, 21, 371.
    CrossRef
  25. Mozgawa W.: J. Mol. Struct. 2001, 596,  129.
    CrossRef
  26. Solovyov L.A :Chem Sov Rev ,2013,42,3708.
    CrossRef
  27. Marina G. Xavier, Samuel F. Banda and Christopher C. Chama : Orient J Chem, 2013, 29(4).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.