ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Organoruthenium (II) Complexes with Thioamide Ligands

R. N. Pandey*, Renu Bala and Anil Kumar Sinha

P.G. Centre of Chemistry (M.U.), College of Commerce, Patna.

Article Publishing History
Article Received on :
Article Accepted on :
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

Some new mined ligand phosphine and arsine complexes of organoruthenium (II) with substituted 1, 2, 4-tetrazoles have been synthesized and characterized using elemental analysis, conductivity, magnetic, electronic, IR, 1H NMR and 31p NMR spectral measurements. IR spectral data provide un-ambiguous evidence for coordination through nitrogen (Ru-N) and sulphur (Ru-S) of the ligand and acts as mononegative bidentate. 31p NMR spectra of complexes confirmed the magnetically equivalent phosphorous atoms suggesting two pf3groups trans to each other in octahedral structure.

KEYWORDS:

Organoruthenium (II); Mixed-ligand triphenyl phosphine; triphenyl arsine; Thioamides

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Pandey R. N, Bala R, Sinha A. K. Organoruthenium (II) Complexes with Thioamide Ligands. Orient J Chem 2011;27(1).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Pandey R. N, Bala R, Sinha A. K. Organoruthenium (II) Complexes with Thioamide Ligands. Orient J Chem 2011;27(1). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=24854


Introduction

Organometallic Chemistry of ruthenium (II) is currently receiving a lot of attention due to catalytic1-3 medicinal4-5, anti-bacterial6 and significant biological activities7-8. The present communication comprises synthesis, spectral characterization structural investigations and nature of metal ligand bonding in some new organometallic compounds of ruthenium (II) with 1, 2, 3, 4 – tetrazoles having thiomide group (I). Moreover, the ligands selected for study are claimed to possess anti-convulsant9, radio protective10 and spermatostatic11 propeties. The anti-bacterial activities against staphylococcus aureus and Escharichia Coli have been reported by copwer et al12.

Experimental

All the reagent used were of anal R or chemically pure grade. Solvents were dried before use. 1-substituted tetrazoline-s-thione were prepared by the method described by Lieber et al.13 The precursor complexes 14 and 15 were prepared according to the literature procedures.

Procedure 

Preparation of Complexes 

To  a solution of  (950 mg, 1 m-mol) Or  (1 g, 1m.mol) in benzene (30 ml) the respective ligands (1m.mol) were added. The resulting solution was stirred on magnetic stirror and concentrated to Ca. 5 ml and the product was separated by the addition of ether. It was filtered and dried in vacuum (yield = 75.80%).

The C, H and N analyses were performed at the C.D.R.I, Lucknow, India. 1H and 31P NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker 400 MHz or varian  instruments using TMS and orthophosphoric acid as references, respectively. Electronic spectra were recorded with Zeiss (Jena) model of automatic recording system. IR spectra of ligands and complexes were recorded by means of Perkin-Elmer 521 spectrophotometer in the range of 4000 – 200 cm-1 using KBr pellets. Molar conductance of complexes were measured in DMF using Wiss-Werkstatter Weithem obb type conductivity meter. The magnetic moment of the complexes were measured at 300 K using gouy balance.

Table 1 : Analytical data of new Ru(II) complexes

Complex/(Colour)

Analysis (%) : Found (Calcd)

 (Cm–1)

Assignment

C H N Ru
Molecular formula

 

(yellow)

 

59.38

(59.60)

4.60

(4.61)

6.61

(6.62)

11.95

(11.94)

19230

16660

28570

34480

 

 

 

(CT intra ligand)

 

(dull yellow)

 

 

53.90

(53.99)

4.10

(4.17)

6.11

(5.99)

10.90

(10.81)

19600

16950

28735

35715

 

 

 

( intra-ligand)

 

(yellow)

 

 

61.30

(61.32)

4.10

(4.20)

6.51

(6.36)

11.50

(11.48)

19230

16950

28575

35090

 

 

 

(CT intra-ligand)

 

 

(faint yellow)

 

55.92

(55.81)

3.79

(3.82)

5.79

(5.78)

10.40

(10.43)

19420

16950

33890

34245

 

 

 

(CT Intra-ligands)

 

(yellow)

 

61.68

(61.77)

4.40

(4.36)

6.28

(6.26)

11.35

(11.30)

19450

16720

28570

35090

 

 

 

(CT Band Intra-ligands)

 

(Dull yellow)

 

56.31

(56.24)

3.95

(3.97)

5.75

(5.70)

10.30

(10.29)

19270

16530

28400

35090

 

 

 

(CT Band)

Results and Discussion

All thioamide ligands interacts with precursor complexes in a 1 : 1 molar ratio in  giving solid derivatives  (; HL = ligands) and acts as mononegative bidentate ligands.

Complexes are thermally stable up to 150ºC, non-hygroscopic, air-stable and shiny crystalline solids. These are sparingly soluble in methanol, benzene, soluble in dichloromethane, acetone, acetonitrile, DMF, DMSO and insoluble in diethyl ether. Analytical data of the complexes are consistent with our formulations. The conductance behavior suggest their non-electrolytic nature.

Table 2 : IR, 1H NMR and 31P NMR spectral data

Compd.

Thio amide Bands (cm–1)

1H NMR (PPM)

31P NMR (PPM)

I

II

III

IV

Aromatic Protons

N-H Protons

 Protons

HL (ligand)

1500s

1280m

1065m

805m

1.52

2.93

1485s

1305m

1045m

770m

7.92

2.92

28.72

1480s

1300m

1050m

775m

8.00

2.94

HL1 (ligand)

1510s

1290m

1050m

810m

7.85

1.54

1490s

1310m

1030m

765m

7.86

2.93

28.82

1500s

1315m

1035m

780m

7.92

2.95

HL2 (ligand)

1504s

1286m

1055m

790m

7.56

1.51

2.95

1495s

1305m

1045m

765m

7.86

2.98

28.80

1490m

1310m

1035m

770m

7.92

2.93

Electronic Spectra 

All complexes are diamagnetic indicating the presence divalent ruthenium () and  ground term in octa hedral crystal field. Two spin allowed transitions  and  may be expected16. The electronic spectral bands at 20400 – 19230 cm–1 and 18660 – 16600 cm–1 assigned to  and  transition respectively indicate octahedral structure of complexes17. The other high intensity bands in UV region at 28570 cm–1 () and at 34480 cm–1 are probably due to charge transfer. The nature of the electronic spectra are similar to those observed for other octahedral ruthenium (II) complexes18.

IR Spectra 

A comparison of IR spectra of ligands and respective complexes indicate formation of  and  bonds. The  (2550 cm–1) and  (3180 cm–1) bands of ligand disappear from the spectra of complexes indicating deprotonation of imino proton on complexation and formation of Ru – N bond. The formation of simultaneous Ru – S and Ru – N bond blue shift thioamide band II (20-30 cm–1) and red shift thioamide band I ( 15-20 cm–1), band III (25-30 cm–1) and band IV (30-40 cm–1) of ligand due to increase in CN bond order and decrease in CS bond  order.19-21 The terminal coordinated  group appeared at 1944 – 1980 cm–1 in all complexes and the characteristic bands due to  or  are also present in the expected region22.

1HNMR and 31P NMR sectra

All the complexes showed signals in the  range due to the aromatic protons of 23. However, broad multiplet in the  region due to phenyl protons of ligands. The broadening of this peak probably due to presence of four nitrogen atoms which may cause large quadrupole resonance broadening effect. The signal for methyl protons appears in the region . The resonances due to imino proton in the ligands observed at  is absent in the spectra of complexes suggesting the formation of  bond and deprotonation of N-H group on complexation.

The 31P NMR spectra of three complexes were recorded in order to confirm the presence of  groups and to determine the stereochemistry of the complexes. The appearance of a signal around 28.82 PPM in the spectra of complexes confirmed the presence of magnetically equivalent phosphorous atoms and thus suggesting that two  groups are trans to each other in octahedral structure24 (II).

References

  1. Bennett M.A, Burce. M.I. and Matheson. T.W., comprehensive organometallic chemistry, vol. 4 edited by G. Wilkinson, P.G. A stone, E.W. Abel (Pergamon, Oxford) 1982, p. 796.
  2. Le Bozec H, Touchard D and Dixneuf P.H, Advances in organometallic chemistry, 29, 163 (1989).
  3. Chung chen W, Lau C.P., Cheng S and Leung V.S., J. organometal chem.. 464, 103 (1994).
  4. Karidi K, Caroufic A, Tsipis A, Hadjiliadis N, Den Dulk. H, and Reedijik J, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 1176 (2005).
  5. Anderberg P.I., Harding M.M., Luck I.J., and Turner P. Inorg. Chem. 41, 1365 (2001).
  6. Balasubramanian K.P, Manivannan S, and Chinnusamy V. J. ultra chem.. vol. 4, 15 (2008)
  7. John E.K and green M.A. J. Med. Chem. 33, 1764 (1990)
  8. Santos L.G., Hagenbach A. and Abram U.J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans, 677 (2004)
  9. Mitchell C.L, Toxicol Appl. Pharmacol. 6, 23 (1964)
  10. Kulyabko, P.N and Dybenko, R.G, Pel’kis, giya, 9 633 (1969)
  11. Tarakhovsk II, M.L et al., Fiziol Aktiv. Veshchestva, 3, 119 (1971)
  12. Cowper, A.J., Astrik, R.R and Thakar, K.A., J. Indian Chem. Soc. 58, 1087 (1981)
  13. Lieber, E, and Ramchandran, J., Cana J. Chem. 37, 101 (1959).
  14. Ahmed, N; Levision, J.J; Robinson, S and Uttley, M.F, Inorg. Synth. 15, 48 (1974)
  15. Sanchez Delgade, R.A; Lee, W.Y; Choi, S.R.; Cho; y; and Jun, M.Y., Trans. Met. Chem 16, 241 (1991)
  16. Singh, T and Singh, J.P. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 69, 241 (1991)
  17. Pandey R.N. and Sharma Richa, J. ultra Chem. 5(3), 361 (2009)
  18. Kaveri, M.V; Prabhakaran R; Karvembu R and Natarajan, k; spectrochim Acta. Part A; 61, 2915 (2005)
  19. Pandey, R.N. and Singh Rajnish Kumar, Oriental J. Chem 25(3), 599 (2009
  20. Pandey R.N, Anand A, Singh R.K and Kumar Amaresh Asian J. Chem. 22(7), 5601 (20  10)
  21. Singh B., Singh R; Choudhary R.V and Thakur K.P., Indian J. Chem 11, 174 (1973)
  22.  El-shahawi M.S and Shoair A.F., Spectrochim. Acta. Part A, 60, 121 (2004)
  23. Kanchanadevi S, Balasubramanian K.P, Chinnusamy V, Karvembu R, and Natarajan K, Trans. Met. Chem.30, 330 (2005)
  24. Balasubramin KP, Raju V.V and Chinnusamy V., J. Indian Chem. Soc. 86, 570(2009).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.