ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Ligand Field Parameters of Some Transition Metal Ion Complexes of Some Substituted Hydrazones and their Antibacterial Activity  

K.T. Joshi1, J. M. Patel1, A. M. Pancholi1 and D. A. Shukla2

1Department of Chemistry, Navjivan Science College, Dahod - 389 151 (India). 2Department of Biology, Navjivan Science College, Dahod - 389 151 (India).

Article Publishing History
Article Received on :
Article Accepted on :
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

Potentiometric studies have been carried out on transition metal complexes of Mn+2, Co+2, Ni+2, Cu+2, Zn+2 with hydrazones synthesized from 4-amino benzoic acid hydrazide and 2-hydroxy-1-acetonephthone/2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde. The dissociation constants of ligand and formation constants of its metal complexes have been determined by Calvin-Bjerrum pH titration technique, as adopted by Irving and Rossotti at 27±0.1ºC and at an ionic strength of 0.1M in 60:40 (v/v) dioxane water medium. The order of the stability of complexes is Cu+2 > Ni+2 > Co+2 > Mn+2 > Zn+2 for both the ligand AHNEH and AHNMH. All the metal complexes screened for their antibacterial activity. The result indicates that the growth of the tested organism was inhibited by most of the compounds.

KEYWORDS:

Antibacterial activity; Transition metal ion complexes; Substituted Hydrazones

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Joshi K. T, Patel J. M, Pancholi A. M, Shukla D. A. Ligand Field Parameters of Some Transition Metal Ion Complexes of Some Substituted Hydrazones and their Antibacterial Activity. Orient J Chem 2011;27(1).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Joshi K. T, Patel J. M, Pancholi A. M, Shukla D. A. Ligand Field Parameters of Some Transition Metal Ion Complexes of Some Substituted Hydrazones and their Antibacterial Activity. Orient J Chem 2011;27(1). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=24795


Introduction

The interest in the study of hydrazones possessing potential donor sites has been intensively increasing last years because of their pharmacological activity, attributed to their ability to form stable chelates with transition metals present in the vivid cell1,2. This process inhibits many vital enzymatic reactions catalyzed by the metal ions. It has been also observed that the biological activity of the hydrazones increases by complexation to metal ions, like copper, nickel, cobalt or iron. Thus, a considerable number of hydrazones and their metal complexes have been reported as tuberculostatic,3,4 antitumor,5,6 antibacterial and antifungal7-9 agents. The thiazole and benzothiazole hydrazones, which have sulphur-nitrogen donor sites, have also been reported to show various pharmacological importance.10,11 A series of hydrazones obtained by the condensation of 2-hydrazinobenzothiazole with aromatic aldehydes have been demonstrated to possess tuberculostatic and anticonvulsant activity12-14. A great number of transition metal complexes with these ligands have been prepared in view of their potential application as antibacterial and antifungal drugs,15,16 but also for the various bonding and stereo chemical possibilities that they offer.17,18 Keeping the above facts in mind and in continuation of our research work19,20  on the transition metal complexes of hydrazones we report here the results of pH metric study of the formation of metal complexes of above ligands.

Experimental

4-amino benzoic acid hydrazide and 2-hydroxy-1-acetonephthone/2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde were synthesized by reported method10-11. The hydroxy hydrazones were synthesized by the equimolar mixture of ethanolic solution of hydrazide and substituted hydroxy ketone/aldehyde were refluxed for three hours. The mixture was poured in cold water and then filtered. The solid product thus obtained was crystallized in ethanol.

We report here the formation constant of transition metal complexes of

(1) 1-(4-aminobenzoyl)-2-[1-(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)ethylidene]hydrazine [ AHNEH]

(2) 1-(4-aminobenzoyl)-2-[1-(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)methylidene]hydrazine [ AHNMH]

The pH metric titrations were carried out against 0.1M KOH solution with a Systronic digital pH meter with glass calomel electrodes to determine the pH. The meter has an accuracy of ±0.01 pH and reproducibility of ±0.02 pH in standard scale operation. The instrument was standardized against 0.05M potassium hydrogen phthalate solution (pH=4) in the beginning of each titration. The metal ion solutions were prepared from the corresponding acetate (BDH, AR) and were standardized by conventional methods21. Solutions of ligands were prepared in pure22 dioxane. Standard carbonate free KOH (E. Merck) solution was prepared by the method of Allen and Low23. Potassium nitrate and nitric acid were used to maintain constant ionic strength. The buffer solution was kept in a Pyrex flask and a few drops of toluene were added as a preservative. The total volume 50ml and (µ = 0.1M KNO3) of each system were kept constant in the beginning of each titration.All other chemicals used were also AR grade.

The proton ligand stability constants of Schiff bases and formation constants of their metal complexes were determined using Calvin-Bjerrum technique as modified by Irving and Rossotti24.

The values of ,  and pL were calculated from the plots of pH vs volume of alkali added. Proton ligand formation curves were obtained by plotting pH vs. Proton ligand formation constants were obtained by Bjerrum half integral values (at =0.5) from the formation curves and were also calculated by Pointwise method. The values determined by two methods are in good agreement with each other. The metal-ligand formation curves were obtained by plotting  vs pL. From these curves the metal ligand formation constants (logK1 and Logk2) were determined by Half Integral, Midpoint slope, Pointwise, Least square, Linear plot and Correction term methods. The values obtained by various methods are in good agreement with each other. The accuracy of the stability constant values is in the order of ±0.02.

Results and Disscussion

The acid-dissociation constant of the ligand was calculated from the potentiometric titration curve of nitric acid in the presence and in the absence of the ligand.  The formation curve for the proton ligand system extended from 0 and 1 in the  scale, suggest that the ligand has one dissociable proton. It is observed from the titration curve that the ligand curve start deviating from free acid curve at about pH=7.5 and the deviation increased continuously up to pH=10.3. It also indicated that hydroxyl   (–OH) group starts to dissociate at about pH= 10.3 to 11. 5.

Irving and Rossotti expression is used to calculate proton ligand formation numbers (). The PK values were estimated from the formation curve ( vs pH) by noting the pH at which =0.5. The accurate values of PK=8.751 and 9.948 were determined by pointwise calculations. Making the use of Bjerrum-pH titration techniques as adopted by Irving and Rossotti, the stability constant of the metal complexes were determined by Half Integral, Midpoint slope, Pointwise, Least square, Linear plot and Correction term methods. The formation of metal complexes between Mn+2, Co+2, Ni+2, Cu+2, Zn+2  and ligand was indicated by (1) The significant departure starting from pH 3.30 to 3.45 of metal titration curves from the ligand curve and (2) The change in colour from light yellow to dark yellow as pH was raised from 3.30 to 9.50. The log K values were directly read from the formation curves ( vs pH) using half integral method. The most accurate log K values were calculated by pointwise calculation (Table: 1&2). The log K1 and logK2 values follow the order as Cu+2 > Ni+2 > Co+2 > Mn+2 > Zn+2 for both the ligand AHNEH and AHNMH. It can be seen that with both the ligand studied, order of logK1 confirm the well established Irving-Williams order.  The values of   ∆log K (log K1– logK2) and log K1/logK2 are given in table: 1&2. The results show that the ratio of log K1/logK2 is positive in all cases.

Table 1: Proton-ligand formation constants of transition metal complexes

Metal ion

Computational method

Formation constants

Log(K1/K2)

Log K1/log K2

Log k1

Log k2

Log B

H+

Point-wise

08.75

08.75

Mn+2

Half Integral

09.96

08.69

18.65

1.27

1.146

Midpoint slope

10.23

09.24

19.47

0.99

1.107

Pointwise

09.66

08.56

18.22

1.10

1.128

Least square

09.39

08.52

17.91

0.87

1.102

Linear plot

10.71

09.52

20.23

1.19

1.125

Correction term

 

08.91

08.02

16.93

0.89

1.110

Co+2

Half Integral

11.61

10.32

21.93

1.29

1.125

Midpoint slope

09.01

08.21

17.22

0.80

1.097

Pointwise

10.07

08.98

19.05

1.09

1.121

Least square

11.58

10.54

22.12

1.04

1.098

Linear plot

10.55

09.54

20.09

1.01

1.105

Correction term

 

09.04

 

08.02

17.06

1.02

1.127

Ni+2

Half Integral

11.01

09.95

20.96

1.06

1.106

Midpoint slope

09.95

08.86

18.81

1.09

1.123

Pointwise

10.14

09.12

19.26

1.02

1.111

Least square

10.72

09.42

20.14

1.3

1.138

Linear plot

11.68

10.73

22.41

0.95

1.088

Correction term

 

09.78

08.74

18.52

1.04

1.118

Cu+2

Half Integral

10.69

09.34

20.03

1.35

1.144

Midpoint slope

09.87

08.80

18.67

1.07

1.121

Pointwise

10.60

09.52

20.12

1.08

1.113

Least square

10.99

09.98

20.97

1.01

1.101

Linear plot

11.87

10.76

22.63

1.11

1.103

Correction term

 

11.23

10.18

21.41

1.05

1.103

Zn+2

Half Integral

09.02

07.81

16.83

1.21

1.154

Midpoint slope

09.72

08.52

18.24

1.20

1.140

Pointwise

10.25

09.13

19.38

1.12

1.122

Least square

09.87

08.85

18.72

1.02

1.115

Linear plot

09.52

08.36

17.88

1.16

1.138

Correction term

 

09.37

08.35

17.72

1.02

1.122

 

Table 2: Proton-ligand formation constants of transition metal complexes

Metal ion

Computational method

Formation constants

Log(K1/K2)

Log K1/log K2

Log k1

Log k2

Log B

H+

Point-wise

09.94

09.94

Mn+2

Half Integral

10.12

09.45

19.57

0.67

1.070

Midpoint slope

10.39

09.82

20.21

0.57

1.058

Pointwise

09.82

09.15

19.07

0.67

1.073

Least square

09.55

08.96

18.53

0.59

1.065

Linear plot

10.87

09.98

21.17

0.89

1.089

Correction term

 

09.07

08.23

17.57

0.84

1.102

Co+2

Half Integral

11.18

10.59

21.77

0.59

1.055

Midpoint slope

10.14

09.55

19.69

0.59

1.061

Pointwise

10.72

10.11

20.83

0.61

1.060

Least square

10.94

10.03

20.97

0.91

1.090

Linear plot

10.37

09.90

20.27

0.47

1.047

Correction term

 

10.73

10.24

20.97

0.49

1.047

Ni+2

Half Integral

10.67

10.18

20.85

0.49

1.048

Midpoint slope

10.97

10.07

21.04

0.90

1.089

Pointwise

10.58

09.58

20.73

0.73

1.074

Least square

11.21

10.25

20.91

0.96

1.093

Linear plot

11.85

10.80

23.22

1.05

1.097

Correction term

 

09.85

08.96

18.81

0.89

1.099

Cu+2

Half Integral

10.02

09.63

19.65

0.39

1.040

Midpoint slope

10.01

09.50

19.51

0.51

1.053

Pointwise

10.95

10.01

21.67

0.94

1.093

Least square

11.95

11.17

23.12

0.78

1.069

Linear plot

11.85

10.76

22.61

1.09

1.101

Correction term

 

11.38

10.65

22.36

0.73

1.068

Zn+2

Half Integral

09.21

08.24

17.79

0.97

1.117

Midpoint slope

10.22

09.23

19.81

0.99

1.107

Pointwise

10.41

09.60

20.19

0.81

1.084

Least square

09.40

08.65

18.17

0.75

1.086

Linear plot

10.04

09.35

19.45

0.69

1.073

Correction term

 

09.58

08.65

18.53

0.93

1.107

Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of all the synthesized compounds was tested against Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus using nutrient agar medium (Hi-Media Laboratories, India) by the method of Tandon et al.(2005). The sterilized (autoclaved at 120 °C for 30 min) medium (40~50°C) was inoculated         (1 ml/100 ml of medium) with the suspension (105 CFU/ml) of the microorganism (matched to McFarland barium sulphate standard) and poured into a petridish to a depth of 3~4 mm. The paper impregnated with the test compounds (50μg/ml in dimethyl formamide) was placed on the solidified medium. The plates were preincubated for 1 h at room temperature and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Neomycin was used as standard for antibacterial activity. The observed zone of inhibition is presented in Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the test compounds

was determined by agar streak dilution method. A stock solution of the synthesized compound (50 μg/ml) in dimethyl formamide was prepared and graded quantities of the test compounds were incorporated in specified quantity of molten sterile nutrient agar. A specified quantity of the medium (40~50 °C) containing the compound was poured into a petridish to a depth of 3~4 mm and allowed to solidify. Suspension of the microorganism was prepared to contain approximately 105 CFU/ml and applied to plates with serially diluted compounds in dimethyl formamide to be tested and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The MIC was considered to be the lowest concentration of the test substance exhibiting no visible growth of bacteria on the plate. The observed inhibition of growth in mm and MIC in μg/ml are presented in Table: 3.

Table 3: Antibacterial activity of the synthesized compounds

Compounds

Zone of inhibition in mm( MIC in µg/ml)

E. coli

B. subtilis

S. aureus
 AHNEH

08(30)

09(33)

08(31)

 [Mn(AHNEH)2]

12(38)

14(35)

13(37)

[Co(AHNEH)2]

10(41)

12(39)

11(39)

[Ni(AHNEH)2]

11(27)

12(37)

12(30)

 [Cu(AHNEH)2]

10(32)

10(41)

13(31)

[Zn(AHNEH)2]

08(21)

09(25)

08(20)

AHNMH

09(32)

08(34)

08(28)

 [Mn(AHNMH)2]

14(45)

11(32)

13(39)

[Co(AHNMH)2]

12(35)

14(34)

13(41)

[Ni(AHNMH)2]

13(41)

12(33)

10(26)

 [Cu(AHNMH)2]

12(29)

13(31)

09(39)

[Zn(AHNMH)2]

09(32)

08(21)

08(22)

Neomycin(30 µg/disk)

24(0.6)

27(0.8)

29(0.8)

Conclusion

The dissociation constants of ligand and formation constants of its metal complexes have been determined by Calvin-Bjerrum pH titration technique. All the compounds moderately inhibited the growth of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. The antibacterial activity was evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition in mm. In the present study, both ligands were showed moderate effective against the bacteria when metal complexes Mn(II) and Co(II) were found to be most potent.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to Dahod Anaj Mahajan Sarvjanic Education society for their active interest in carrying out this work.

References

  1. Terzioglu G. N. and Otuk G.J., Med. Chem., 32, 753-757(1997).
  2. Popp F. D., J. Heterocyclic Chem., 21, 1641-1645(1984).
  3. Singh N. K, Agrawal N. and Agarwal R. C., Indian J. Chem., 23A 1011-1015 (1984).
  4. Kumar Y. and Sethi P. D., J. Indian Chem. Soc., 67, 796-799(1990).
  5. Mohan M, Gupta M. P, Chandra L. and Jha N. K., Inorg.Chim. Acta, 151, 61-68(1988).
  6. Mohan M, Kumar A. and Kumar M., Inorg. Chim. Acta., 136, 65-74 (1987).
  7. Sharma R. C, Ambwani J. and Varshney V. K., J. Indian Chem. Soc., 69, 770-772 (1992).
  8. Singh N. K. and Singh D. K., Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem., 32, 203-218(2002).
  9. Chohan Z. H, Khan K. M. and Supuran C. T., Appl.Organomet. Chem., 18, 305-310(2004).
  10. Şumalan L, Macarovici D, Neamţu M. and Coman M., Rev. Roum. Chim., 42, 277-280(1997).
  11. Yilmaz  and Çukurovali  A., Polish J. Chem., 78, 663-772(2004).
  12. Katz L., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 73, 4007-4010(1951).
  13. Carp E. and Toma A., Analele Univ. Ştiinţ. “Al.I. Cuza”,Iaşi, Sect. Chim., 11c, 67-72(1965).
  14. Gheorghiu C. V. and Carp E., Analele Univ. Ştiinţ. “Al.I. Cuza”, Iaşi, Sect. I., 3, 367-372(1957).
  15.  Tiwari G. D, Tripathi Ar., Tripathi An, Kumari O. and Reddy M. V. B., J. Indian Chem. Soc., 71, 755-756(1994).
  16. Kabeer Shaikh, Baseer M. A. and Mote N. A., Asian J. Chem., 13, 496-500           (2001).
  17. Hamman A. H, Ibrahim S. A, Abo Elwafa M. H, El-Gahami M. A. and Thabet W., Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org.Chem., 22, 1401-1416(1992).
  18. Girish S. R, Revankar V. K. and Mahale V. B., Trans. Met.Chem., 21, 401-405 (1996).
  19. Joshi K. T, Dabhi H. R, Rai R. K, Pancholi A. M. and Rana A. K., Acta Ciencia Indica., Vol. XXV C, No. 1, 013(1999).
  20. Fancholi A. M, Patel M. A. and Shah K. J., Indian Journal of Chemical Sciences, 5, 39(1991).
  21. Vogel A. I., A Text-book of quantitative inorganic analysts, (Longmans Green & Co, London) (1971).
  22. Vogel A. I., A Text-book of Practical Organic Chemistry, (Longmans Green & Co, London) 177(1956).
  23. Allen N. and Low G. W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Analyst Edu., 5, 195(1933).
  24. Irving H. and Rossotti H. S., J. Chem. Soc., 2904(1954).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.