Review Article | Open Access

A Review onRecent Advances in HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography)Under Green ChromatographyMethods

Udaya Kumar.N1*, Jayachandra Reddy.P2, Chanakya Prasad.K1, Sai Teja.K1, Lakshmi Bhargavi.K1, Mahalakshmi.M1, Sandhya.L1and Uday Kiran.N1

1Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Chemistry, MB School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mohan Babu University, Sree Sainath Nagar, Rangampeta, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

2Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Chemistry, Mahathi College of Pharmacy, CTM Cross Roads, Madana Palle, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Corresponding Author E-mail:uday307@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/410526

Download this article as:  PDF

ABSTRACT:

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) represents a fundamental analytical technique that has transformed chemical analysis across multiple sectors. Modern HPLC combines advanced column technologies (sub-2-μm particles, monolithic columns) with sophisticated detection systems and automated platforms, enabling superior separation efficiency and analytical precision. Major technological advances include the development of UHPLC, integration with mass spectrometry, and implementation of green chemistry principles, resulting in faster analyses and reduced environmental impact. The technology continues to evolve through AI integration, automated method development, and miniaturization trends, adapting to emerging analytical challenges in pharmaceuticals, environmental monitoring, and clinical diagnostics. Recent innovations focus on enhancing portability, reducing analysis times, and improving sustainability while maintaining analytical robustness and reliability.

KEYWORDS:

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography; Method Development; Retention factor; Separation; Validation

Introduction

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) stands as a fundamental analytical technique that revolutionized the field of separation science since its inception in the late 1960s.1 The technique evolved from traditional column chromatography, incorporating high-pressure systems and advanced stationary phases to achieve superior separation efficiency.2 The development of HPLC marked a significant milestone in analytical chemistry, enabling the analysis of non-volatile compounds that were previously challenging to separate using gas chromatography.3

The basic principle of HPLC relies on the differential partition of analytes between a mobile phase and a stationary phase under high pressure conditions.4 The continuous advancement in pump technology, allowing for stable high-pressure operation, has been crucial in achieving reliable and reproducible separations.5 Modern HPLC systems can operate at pressures exceeding 6000 psi, facilitating faster analysis times and improved resolution.6

The versatility of HPLC in analyzing diverse chemical compounds has led to its widespread adoption across multiple industries, including pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental monitoring, and clinical diagnostics.7 The pharmaceutical industry, in particular, has benefited significantly from HPLC applications in drug development, quality control, and stability testing.8 The technique’s ability to separate, identify, and quantify compounds in complex matrices with high precision has made it an indispensable tool in analytical laboratories worldwide.9

Recent technological innovations have focused on improving separation efficiency, reducing analysis time, and minimizing environmental impact.10 The introduction of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) systems, utilizing sub-2-μm particle columns, has enabled faster separations while maintaining or improving chromatographic resolution.11 Additionally, the development of new stationary phases, including core-shell particles and monolithic columns, has expanded the application range of HPLC.12

The coupling of HPLC with various detection systems has enhanced its analytical capabilities significantly 13. Mass spectrometry, in particular, has emerged as a powerful complementary technique, providing structural information and improved selectivity in complex sample analysis14. The integration of advanced data processing systems and automation has further streamlined HPLC analysis, reducing operator dependency and improving analytical throughput15 

Instrumentation

The fundamental components of modern HPLC systems have undergone significant refinements to meet increasing analytical demands. A typical HPLC system consists of several components, each contributing to the overall analytical performance16.

Solvent Delivery System

Modern HPLC pumps have evolved to provide precise and pulse-free flow at high pressures. Binary and quaternary gradient systems enable sophisticated mobile phase compositions, essential for complex separations 17. The development of ultra-high-pressure pumps capable of operating above 15,000 psi has facilitated the use of smaller particle size columns and faster separations.18

Sample Introduction

Autosampler technology has advanced considerably, offering high-precision injection volumes ranging from sub-microliter to milliliter quantities. Temperature-controlled sample storage and automated sample preparation capabilities have improved sample stability and reduced analytical variability 19. Modern autosamplers incorporate needle wash stations and variable injection volumes, minimizing carryover and improving quantitative accuracy.20

Column Technology

Column technology represents one of the most significant areas of advancement in HPLC (summarized in Table 1).

Table 1: Comparison of Different HPLC Column Technologies

Column Type Particle Size (μm) Pressure Range (psi) Key Advantages Main Applications
Conventional 3.0-5.0 2000-4000 Cost-effective, Robust General analysis
Sub-2-μm <2.0 6000-15000 High efficiency, Fast analysis High-throughput screening
Core-shell 2.6-2.7 4000-9000 Enhanced efficiency, Lower pressure Complex matrices
Monolithic N/A 1000-3000 High permeability, Fast analysis Biological samples
Mixed-mode 3.0-5.0 2000-6000 Multiple retention mechanisms Multi-analyte separation

The introduction of sub-2-μm particles has revolutionized separation efficiency and speed 21. Core-shell particles, combining a solid core with a porous outer layer, offer reduced diffusion paths and improved mass transfer characteristics.22 Monolithic columns, featuring a continuous bed of porous material, provide high permeability and efficiency, particularly suitable for biological samples.23

Detection Systems

The evolution of detection systems has greatly expanded HPLC applications. UV-visible spectrophotometry remains the most widely used detection method, with modern diode array detectors offering simultaneous multi-wavelength detection and spectral analysis 24. Fluorescence detectors provide high sensitivity for naturally fluorescent compounds or derivatives, while refractive index detectors offer universal detection capabilities 25. Recent trends in HPLC detection systems are listed out in Table 2.

Table 2: Recent Advances in HPLC Detection Systems

Detection Type Detection Limit Key Features Primary Applications
UV-DAD ng-μg/mL Multi-wavelength detection, Spectral analysis General analysis, Purity assessment
Fluorescence pg-ng/mL High sensitivity, Selectivity Trace analysis, Biological compounds
Mass Spectrometry fg-pg/mL Structural information, High selectivity Complex mixture analysis, Unknown identification
CAD/ELSD ng-μg/mL Universal detection, Non-volatile compounds Lipids, Polymers, Carbohydrates
Electrochemical pg-ng/mL High sensitivity for electroactive compounds Neurotransmitters, Oxidizable compounds

Mass Spectrometric Detection

The coupling of HPLC with mass spectrometry has created powerful analytical platforms. Various ionization techniques, including electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), enable the analysis of diverse compound classes 26. High-resolution mass spectrometers provide accurate mass measurements and structural information, essential for compound identification and characterization.27

Data Systems and Software

Modern HPLC systems incorporate sophisticated data handling capabilities. Advanced software packages provide instrument control, data acquisition, and processing functions28. Method development software assists in optimizing separation conditions, while data analysis tools enable automated peak integration and reporting.29

Method Development and Optimization

Method development in HPLC requires careful consideration of multiple parameters to achieve optimal separation and analysis. The systematic approach to method development has evolved with the incorporation of advanced analytical tools and strategies.

Mobile Phase Selection

The choice of mobile phase composition significantly influences separation selectivity and efficiency. The selection between reversed-phase, normal-phase, or hydrophilic interaction chromatography depends on analyte properties and separation requirements.30 Buffer selection, pH control, and organic modifier ratios play crucial roles in achieving reproducible separations and maintaining column performance.31

Stationary Phase Considerations

The selection of appropriate stationary phases requires understanding the molecular interactions between analytes and column chemistry 32. Modified silica phases, including C18, C8, and phenyl columns, offer different selectivity patterns for various compound classes 33. The emergence of mixed-mode columns combining multiple retention mechanisms has expanded separation possibilities for complex samples 34.

Temperature Effects

Column temperature control has emerged as a critical parameter in method development. Elevated temperatures can reduce mobile phase viscosity, allowing faster flow rates and improved mass transfer.35 Temperature programming capabilities in modern HPLC systems enable thermal gradients as an additional optimization parameter.36 A summary of common HPLC method development parameters is provided in Table.37

Table 3: Common HPLC Method Development Parameters and Their Impact on Separation

Parameter Variable Range Impact on Separation Optimization Strategy
Mobile Phase pH 2-8 Selectivity, Peak shape, Retention Match to analyte pKa ±2 units
Organic Modifier (%) 5-95 Retention, Resolution Start with isocratic, move to gradient if needed
Flow Rate (mL/min) 0.1-2.0 Analysis time, Pressure, Efficiency Balance resolution vs. time
Column Temperature (°C) 20-60 Selectivity, Viscosity, Efficiency Consider sample stability
Injection Volume (μL) 1-100 Peak shape, System precision Based on sample concentration
Gradient Time (min) 5-60 Resolution, Peak capacity Start shallow, adjust as needed

Method Validation

Validation protocols ensure method reliability and compliance with regulatory requirements. Main validation parameters include specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and robustness 37. The implementation of quality by design (QbD) principles in method development has enhanced method understanding and robustness 38. HPLC components and future trends are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: HPLC components and future trends

Click here to View Figure

Green Chromatography

Environmental considerations have led to the development of greener HPLC methods. Strategies include:

Mobile Phase Conservation

Reduced column dimensions and flow rates minimize solvent consumption while maintaining separation efficiency.39 The use of recycling systems and alternative solvents has decreased environmental impact.40

Alternative Technologies

Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) offers an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional HPLC for suitable applications.41 The development of water-based mobile phases and biodegradable stationary phases represents emerging trends in green chromatography.42

Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is a chromatographic technique that utilizes a supercritical fluid, like carbon dioxide, as the mobile phase, offering advantages over high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). SFC uses a mobile phase with properties between liquids and gases, leading to faster separations and potentially higher resolution compared to traditional HPLC. While similar in some aspects to HPLC, SFC differentiates itself by using a supercritical fluid, which offers unique benefits like lower viscosity and higher diffusivity.

Automated Method Development

Modern approach to method development incorporates automation and artificial intelligence

Software-Assisted Optimization

Computer-assisted method development tools predict optimal conditions based on molecular structure and physicochemical properties.43 Machine learning algorithms analyze large datasets to identify critical method parameters and predict chromatographic behavior.44

High-Throughput Screening

Automated column and mobile phase screening systems enable rapid method optimization.45 Parallel chromatography systems increase the efficiency of method development processes.46

Applications and Current Trends

The versatility of HPLC has enabled its application across numerous fields, demonstrating its significance as an analytical tool in various industries.

Pharmaceutical Analysis

Drug Development and Quality Control

HPLC serves as the primary analytical technique for pharmaceutical compound analysis, including drug substance characterization and impurity profiling.47 The technique enables monitoring of drug stability, degradation products, and formulation studies.48

Bioanalysis

The analysis of drugs and metabolites in biological matrices requires sensitive and selective HPLC methods.49 Advanced sample preparation techniques coupled with HPLC-MS/MS have revolutionized bioequivalence studies and therapeutic drug monitoring.50

Clinical Applications

Diagnostic Testing

HPLC methods facilitate the analysis of biological markers, vitamins, and hormones in clinical samples.51 The technique enables monitoring of therapeutic drugs and their metabolites in patient samples.52

Metabolomics:
High-resolution HPLC-MS systems provide comprehensive metabolite profiling in biological samples.53 The integration of ion mobility spectrometry has enhanced the separation of isomeric metabolites.54

Environmental Analysis:

Pollutant Monitoring

HPLC methods enable the detection and quantification of organic pollutants in environmental samples.55 The analysis of pesticides, industrial chemicals, and their degradation products in water and soil matrices has become increasingly important.56

Food and Beverage Analysis

Quality Assessment

HPLC applications in food analysis include the determination of nutrients, additives, and contaminants.57 The technique enables authentication studies and detection of food adulterants.58

Natural Products Analysis:

Characterization of complex plant extracts and identification of bioactive compounds rely heavily on HPLC separation.59 The coupling with mass spectrometry facilitates the structural elucidation of novel natural compounds.60

Industrial Applications

Process Monitoring

Online HPLC systems enable real-time monitoring of chemical processes and quality control in manufacturing.61 The development of process analytical technology (PAT) has integrated HPLC into continuous manufacturing processes.62

Polymer Analysis

Size-exclusion chromatography coupled with multiple detection systems provides detailed characterization of synthetic polymers.63 The analysis of protein aggregates and biological macromolecules benefits from advanced SEC-HPLC methods.64

Conclusion

The continuous evolution of HPLC technology has significantly enhanced its analytical capabilities across diverse applications. The integration of advanced column technologies, sophisticated detection systems, and automated method development platforms has improved separation efficiency, sensitivity, and throughput. Modern HPLC systems, coupled with artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, are moving towards more intelligent and autonomous operation. The future development of HPLC will likely focus on miniaturization, sustainability, and enhanced integration with complementary analytical techniques, ensuring its continued role as a corner stone analytical method in scientific research and industrial applications

Green chromatography methods in HPLC aim to reduce environmental impact by minimizing solvent use, energy consumption, and waste generation while maintaining analytical performance. This involves using less hazardous solvents, optimizing instrument settings, and adopting efficient separation techniques.

Acknowledgement

The support provided by the Mohan Babu University and Mahathi College of Pharmacy is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of Interest

The author declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Snyder.L.R, Kirkland.J.J and Dolan.J.W, Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, John Wiley & Sons. 2011, New York.
  2. Dong.M.W, Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists, John Wiley & Sons.2019, New York.
    CrossRef
  3. Meyer.V.R, Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, John Wiley & Sons.2013, New York.
  4. Moldoveanu.S.C and David.V, Essentials in Modern HPLC Separations, Elsevier.2013, Amsterdam.
  5. Neue.U.D, HPLC Columns: Theory, Technology, and Practice.1997, Wiley-VCH, New York.
  6. Zhang.Y and Carr.P.W, J. Chromatogr. A. 2009, 1216, 6685.
    CrossRef
  7. Guillarme.D, Nguyen.D.T, Rudaz.S and Veuthey.J.L, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.2008, 34, 205.
  8. Fekete.S, Schappler.J,Veuthey.J.L and Guillarme.D, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.2014, 2, 63.
    CrossRef
  9. González-Ruiz.V, Olives.A.I and Martín.M.A, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.2015, 64, 17.
    CrossRef
  10. Chromacademy.M, HPLC Method Development, Crawford Scientific 2020.
  11. Gritti.F and Guiochon.G, J. Chromatogr. A, 2012, 2,1228.
    CrossRef
  12. Carr.P.W, Wang.X and Stoll D.R Anal. Chem.2009, 81, 5342.
    CrossRef
  13. Holčapek.M, Jirásko.R and Lísa.M, J. Chromatogr.2012 A, 3,1259.
    CrossRef
  14. Walter.T.H and  Andrews.R.W, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.2014,14, 63.
    CrossRef
  15. Fanali.S, Haddad.P.R, Poole.C and Riekkola.M.L,Liquid Chromatography: Applications, Elsevier, 2017 Amsterdam.
  16. Raynie.D and R.E. Majors.R.E, LC GC N. Am., 2018, 36, 508.
  17. Kirkland.J.J, Schuster.S.A, Johnson.W.L and Boyes.B.E J. Pharm. Anal.2013, 3, 303.
    CrossRef
  18. MacNair.J.E, K.C. Lewis.K.V and Jorgenson.J.W, Anal. Chem.1997, 69, 983.
    CrossRef
  19. Wahab.M.F, Patel.D.C, and Armstrong.D.W, J. Chromatogr. A,2017,163, 1509.
    CrossRef
  20. Dong. M.W and Zhang.K, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.2014, 21, 63.
    CrossRef
  21. Hayes.R, Ahmed.A, Edge.T and Zhang.H J. Chromatogr. A.2014,36,1357.
    CrossRef
  22. Gritti.F and Guiochon.G J. Chromatogr. A.2010, 1217, 8167.
    CrossRef
  23. K. Cabrera, J. Sep. Sci.2004, 27, 843.
    CrossRef
  24. Swartz.M.E, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol.2005, 28, 1253.
    CrossRef
  25. Zhang.L,Dai.Q, Qiao.X, Yu.C,Qin.X and Yan.H, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.2016, 82, 143.
    CrossRef
  26. Cai.S.S and Syage J.A, J. Chromatogr. A.2006,15, 1110.
    CrossRef
  27. T. Kind and O. Fiehn, Bioanal. Rev.2010, 2, 23.
    CrossRef
  28. D.C. Patel, M.F. Wahab, D.W. Armstrong and Z.S. Breitbach, J. Chromatogr. A, 2016, 2,1467.
    CrossRef
  29. Borges.E.M, J. Chromatogr. Sci.2015, 53, 580.
    CrossRef
  30. Fekete.S, Veuthey.J.L and Guillarme.D, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.2012, 9, 69.
    CrossRef
  31. McCalley D.V, J. Chromatogr. A.2017,49, 1523.
    CrossRef
  32. Snyder.L.R and Dolan.J.W. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model, John Wiley & Sons.2007, New York.
    CrossRef
  33. Jandera.P, Anal. Chim. Acta.2011,1, 692.
    CrossRef
  34. Walter.T.H, Iraneta.P and Capparella.M, J. Chromatogr. A, 2005,177, 1075.
    CrossRef
  35. Thompson.J.D and  Carr.P.W, Anal. Chem.2002,74, 1017.
    CrossRef
  36. Teutenberg.T, High-Temperature Liquid Chromatography: A User’s Guide for Method Development, Royal Society of Chemistry.2010, London.
  37. Krull and M. Swartz, J. Chromatogr. A.1997,11, 787.
  38. Nethercote.P and Ermer.J, Pharm. Technol.2012, 36, 74.
  39. Sandra.P, Vanhoenacker. David.G.F, Sandra.K and Pereira.A, LC GC Eur.2010, 23, 242.
  40. Y. Gaber, U. Törnvall, M.A. Kumar, M.A. Amin and R. Hatti-Kaul, Tetrahedron Lett.2011, 52, 5096.
  41. Taylor.L.T, J. Supercrit. Fluids.2009, 47, 566.
    CrossRef
  42. Welch.C.J,Wu.N,Biba.M,Hartman.R,Brkovic.T and Gong.X, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.2010, 29, 667.
    CrossRef
  43. Molnár, C. Markopoulou and Z. Pataj, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.2018, 64, 159.
  44. Talebi.M, Schoenmakers.P.J and Strasters.J, J. Chromatogr. A.2019,67,1598.
  45. Krisko.R.M, McLaughlin.K,Koenigbauer.M.J and Lunte.C.E J. Chromatogr. A.2006,186, 1122.
    CrossRef
  46. Debrus.B,Lebrun.P, Kindenge.J.M, Lecomte.F, Ceccato.A and Caliaro.G J. Chromatogr. A.2011,1218, 5205.
    CrossRef
  47. Rozet.E, Marini.R.D, Ziemons.E,Boulanger.B and Hubert.P, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.2011, 55, 848.
    CrossRef
  48. S. Görög, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.2007,12, 26.
    CrossRef
  49. Nováková.L and Vlčková.H Anal. Chim. Acta.2009,8, 656.
    CrossRef
  50. W.A. Korfmacher, Drug Discov. Today, 2005, 10, 1357.
    CrossRef
  51. Want.E.J, Wilson.I.D, Gika.H, Theodoridis.G, Plumb.R.S and Shockcor.J Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1005.
    CrossRef
  52. Seger.C and Griesmacher.A, Biochem. Med.2007,29, 17.
    CrossRef
  53. Zhang, H. Sun, P. Wang, Y. Han and X. Wang, Analyst.2012,137, 293.
    CrossRef
  54. May.J.C and McLean.J.A, Anal. Chem.2015, 87, 1422.
    CrossRef
  55. Richardson.S.D, Anal. Chem.2012, 84, 747.
    CrossRef
  56. Hernández.F, Sancho.J.V, Ibáñez.M,Abad.E, Portolés.T and Mattioli.L Anal. Bioanal. Chem.2012, 403, 1251.
    CrossRef
  57. Malik.A.K, Blasco.C and Picó.Y J. Chromatogr. A.2010, 1217, 4018.
    CrossRef
  58. Álvarez-Rivera.G,Dagnac.T, Lores.M,García-Jares.C,Sánchez-Prado.L and J.P. Lamas.J.P, J. Chromatogr. A.2012,41, 1270.
    CrossRef
  59. Wolfender.J.L,Marti.G,Thomas.A and Bertrand.S, J. Chromatogr. A,2015,136, 1382.
    CrossRef
  60. Shyur.L.F and Yang.N.S, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.2008,12,66.
    CrossRef
  61. Rathore.A.S,Bhambure.R and Ghare.V Anal. Bioanal. Chem.2010,137, 398.
    CrossRef
  62. Nickerson.B, Sample Preparation of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Challenges and Strategies for Sample Preparation and Extraction, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, New York.
    CrossRef
  63. Pasch.H and Trathnigg.B, HPLC of Polymers, Springer Science & Business Media.2013, Berlin.
  64. Hong.P, Koza.S and Bouvier.E.S, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol.2012, 35,2923.
    CrossRef

Article Metrics
Views PlumX: 
Views Views:  2519 Views
PDF Downloads PDF Downloads:  1114
Article Publishing History
Received on: 06 Mar 2025
Accepted on: 13 Sep 2025
Article Review Details
Reviewed by: Dr. Rashim Mohammad
Second Review by: Dr. Reena Sharma
Final Approval by: Dr. Abdelwahab Omri
Share
Journal is Indexed in

Cabells Whitelist

Journal Archived in: