Antioxidant Activity and Molecular Docking Study of Isolated Bioactive Compound from Linum usitatissimum


Sunaina1* and Phool Chandra2

Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Teerthankar Mahaveer University, Moradabad-244001, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Corresponding Author E-mail:sunainarathore8171@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/410625

Download this article as:  PDF

ABSTRACT:

Flaxseed, or Linum usitatissimum L., is a medicinal plant that is high in phytochemicals such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, and lignans, which give it strong antioxidant properties. In this study, a major antioxidant component of flaxseed was isolated and identified, and its interaction with the NF-κB protein was examined utilizing molecular docking. The Soxhlet device was used to obtain the ethanol extract, and column chromatography was used to isolate it. After FTIR, NMR, and LC-MS analyses, the chemically pure molecule was identified as p-coumaric acid. The DPPH & ABTS radical scavenging assays were used to determine its antioxidant capacity, and the results showed modest antioxidant activity with a TEAC of 8.05 µmol/mg and an RSA of 2.90% for DPPH. According to the ABTS assay, the TEAC was 4.698 µmol/mg, and the RSA was 1.606%.  The Schrodinger suite molecular docking showed hydrogen bond interactions between TYR251, SER288, & LYS221 along with a high binding affinity of -5.299 to the NFκB protein (PDB ID: 1IKN). The findings suggest that p-coumaric acid may operate as a natural inhibitor of the NFκB protein, hence influencing its antioxidant capacity. The study confirms the therapeutic efficacy of bioactives obtained from flaxseed and the use of computational methods to investigate molecular pathways.

KEYWORDS:

Antioxidant activity; ABTS; DPPH; flavonoids; Linum usitatissimum; Molecular Docking; NF-κB; p-coumaric acid

Introduction

Often referred to as flaxseed or linseed, Linum usitatissimum L. is a significant annual herbaceous crop in the family Linaceae. Because it has been farmed on a vast scale for its fiber and oil seeds1–4, it is a very nutritional and medicinal plant. The seeds have phytochemicals like phenolic acids, flavonoids, secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG), & alpha-linolenic acid, an omega-3 fatty acid needed for a balanced diet. Extensive studies on the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, & lipid-lowering properties of these bioactives have shown the usefulness of flaxseed in controlling chronic diseases and promoting general well-being5–8. Flaxseed’s low level of phenolic chemicals, well known for their powerful antioxidant properties, makes it unique.   Including the nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB), a transcription factor essential for inflammation, immunological response, and oxidative damage control, it plays a significant role in preventing free radicals and controlling pathways linked with oxidative stress9,10.  Among the pathological diseases connected to NFκB dysregulation are diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.  Consequently, dietary antioxidants from plants are turning into natural NFκB blockers for therapeutic application9. Over the last few decades, molecular docking has developed into a vital computational tool in phytochemical research and drug discovery.   It allows virtual screening for and prediction of target protein- ligand interactions, which helps to clarify prospective therapeutic pathways and improve lead compound optimization9,11. Against this context, the current work investigated the antioxidant capability of a pure Linum usitatissimum molecule and its possible method of action via molecular docking against NFκB. Using chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques, the primary bioactive component was purified and identified. Its antioxidant activity was evaluated using DPPH and ABTS assays, and its molecular interaction with NF-κB was examined using in silico docking simulations. This integrated approach attempts to make the compound’s use as a naturally occurring antioxidant of possible medicinal interest relevant.

Materials and Methods

Plant Authentication and Collection

An expert, Dr. Sunita Garg, Scientist F & Head Raw Material Herbarium & Museum (NIScPR), New Delhi, India, recognized fresh Linum usitatissimum seeds that were gathered in July from a botanical garden in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.  For future use, a voucher specimen (NIScPR/RHMD/Consult/2023/4520-21) has been retained at the department.

Drug and Chemical

Chemicals used in the study were purchased from Central Drug House Ltd., New Delhi, India.

Soxhlet Extraction Linum usitatissimum

Linum usitatissimum seeds (500g) were dried for 2-3 days, then crushed into powder form and defatted with petroleum ether and then extracted using the Soxhlet apparatus with ethanol. The extracted Linum usitatissimum seeds were filtered and evaporated under a rotary vacuum evaporator at 37°C. and yield value 39.15 % stored airtight container for subsequent use12.

Preliminary Phytochemical Screening 

Linum usitatissimum extract was subjected to qualitative chemical testing for the presence as well as absence of phytochemicals including alkaloids, flavonoids glycosides, which tannins, saponin, while phenolic groups7.

Thin Layer Chromatography

Linum usitatissimum extract was applied on a silica-coated aluminum plate and developed to obtain saturation. The plate was then put into the solvent system Ethanol: Ethyl acetate (90:10) ratio. Then dried the plate was dried and developed with an appropriate reagent followed by visualization under an iodine chamber. The Rf values were calculated further13.

Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

TFC 1 mg of Linum usitatissimum extract to gauge the extract’s concentration, it was dissolved in 2.8 milliliters of H2O, 0.1 milligram of 10% AlCl3, 0.1 ml of 1 M C2H3KO2, or 1.5 milligrams of C2H5OH. This mix was incubated at 37⁰C for half an hour. A Systromic UV-Vis Double Beam Spectrophotometer was used to find the absorbance at 415 nanometers. Different quercetin levels (10-50 µg/ml) followed the same process. The TFC was calculated using Quercetin as a standard, and results were published as Quercetin equivalents (mg QE)//g of the sample14–16.

Isolation and Characterization 

After that, a silica gel (Merck Silica gel 60) was used for Column chromatography of the Linum usitatissimum extract. A solvent system was used to elute the column after it was packed onto a hydrodynamic column. The stationary phase was made up of this. The extract from Linum usitatissimum was then placed onto the silica gel as a thin band after being combined with a tiny quantity of the mobile phase. After adding the mobile phase at a steady flow rate, Linum usitatissimum extract was applied to the (silica gel 60). Using solvent mixtures made of (n-hexane and ethyl acetate), a gradient elution of increasing polarity was started, which involved the serial elution of many fractions under TLC monitoring17. The isolated compound was characterized by different spectroscopic techniques (that is, IR, NMR, and LC-MS)11.

Molecular Docking Study

Ligand Preparation and Optimization

The structure of the isolated bioactive compound (identified as p-coumaric acid) was first drawn using ChemDraw and saved in .mol format. The compound was then subjected to geometric optimization using the LigPrep tool in the Schrodinger suite (version 2023-1). LigPrep processed the ligand by generating appropriate stereoisomers, tautomers, and ionization states at a physiological pH of 7.0 ± 0.5, using the OPLS-2005 force field to diminish energy and ensure conformational stability.

Protein Preparation

The crystal structure of the human NF-κB protein (PDB ID: 1IKN) was retrieved from the PDB (Protein data bank). The structure was improved by adding hydrogen atoms, fixing missing side chains, and eliminating water molecules larger than 5 Å using the Protein Preparation Wizard in the Schrodinger suite. The optimization of hydrogen-bonding networks and energy minimization was carried out using the OPLS-2005 force field to stabilize the native protein conformation.

Grid Generation and Protocol of Docking

A receptor grid was created around the active site of NF-κB, centering on the co-crystallized ligand binding pocket. Molecular docking was performed using the Glide XP (extra precision) mode, which considers both polar and non-polar interactions, rotatable bonds, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic contacts. Docking results were evaluated based on Glide Score, XP GScore, Emodel energy, hydrogen bond interactions, and bonding distances.

Antioxidant Activity

DPPH

The assay was conducted as described. Briefly, 0.1 milliliter sample solution was added by 3.9 milliliter free radical resolution, and the absorption was measured after 30 min at 518 nanometers. A calibration curvature with six Trolox standards was plotted. Using the following formula, the inhibition of the DPPH scavenging effect (%) was determined using eqn.1:

Where A0= The absorbance of control

A1= The absorbance of standard

The TEAC was calculated using eqn. 2

Isolated phytoconstituent was used for determining antioxidant evaluation DPPH radical scavenging capacity18.

ABTS

The technique depends on the antioxidant molecules’ capacity to neutralize the persistent ABTS radical.  To make a stable stock solution of the ABTS radical, 2.45 mmol/L K2S2O8 (final concentration) was mixed with 7 mmol/L ABTS aqueous solution. Before being used, the mixture was left to stand for 12 to 16 hours at 37⁰C in the dark. In order to establish an ABTS radical working solution at the beginning of the investigation, the stock solution was diluted in ethanol until it had an absorbance of 0.70±0.02 at 734 nm. Next, 1 mg of sample extract dissolved in 1 ml of methanol was mixed with 4.85 ml of diluted ABTS radical solution. After the first mixing, the absorbance at 734 nm was measured six minutes later. Various amounts of Trolox (10-50 µmol) were prepared, and they were treated with an equivalent volume of radical solution. Six minutes later, optical density was assessed in a control that included 4.85 milliliters of ABTS solution and 0.15 milliliters of 45% ethanol. Trolox’s optical density was determined, & the percentage of ABTS radical scavenging was calculated using the using eqn. 3:

The % scavenging curve generated from Trolox standard was used to estimate the Trolox equivalent(mM/gm) for the isolated compound19.

Results

Extraction

The preliminary analysis of the Linum usitatissimum extract demonstrated significant extraction efficiency, with a percentage yield of 39.15%.

Phytochemical Screening

The results of the screening for phytochemicals revealed the presence of various bioactive components, which are brief in Table 1.

Table 1: Preliminary Phytochemical Components in the Seeds of Linum usitatissimum Extract

S.No.  Test Test name/reagents Linum usitatissimum extract
1 Alkaloids Dragendroff’s

Mayer’s

+

+

2 Saponins Froth test

Ferric chloride test

+

3 Glycosides Grignard test +
4 Flavonoids Free flavonoids

Borntrager s test

+

+

5 Steroids Salwaski test
6 Tannins Phlobatannins
7 Phenolic group Ethanolic FeCL3 solution +
8 Sugars Molisch’s test

Fehling’s

+

(-) Negative result &Positive result (+) Linum usitatissimum extract

Total Flavonoid Content

The TFC of the isolated compound was ascertained using the AlCl3 method. Using quercetin as a reference, the solution mixture’s absorbance was measured at 415 nm (Figure 1). The standardization curve of quercetin showed linearity in the variety of 10-40 micrograms per milliliter (R² = 1). The TFC of the isolated compound was calculated using the y=0.001x obtained from the quercetin standard curvature and was stated as milligrams of quercetin equivalent (mg QE) per gram of the compound. The TFC of the isolated compound was found to be 2.1 mg QE/g of the compound. This result indicates the positive of a significant measure of flavonoids, suggesting its potential biological and pharmacological relevance

Isolation of Phytoconstituents

The Linum usitatissimum extract using the following ratios 100:0, 80:20, 60:40, 30:70, 20:80, n-Hexane: ethyl acetate and 0:100, the fraction was eluted with stepwise gradient polarity after being subjected to column chromatography on silica gel. For the various solvent system ratios to the specified seven fractions, 50 ml fractions were gathered. Two Fractions with a clear spot having the same Rf value were combined Table 2. The compound was characterized by FTIR, NMR, and LCMS spectra.

Table 2: Fractions collected in Column Chromatography of Linum usitatissimum extract

Solvent system Ratio Fractions number Thin layer chromatography Fractions code
n-H: E acetate 100::0 1 No spot EE-1
n-H: E acetate 80:20 2 No spot EE-2
n-H: E acetate 60:40 3,4 Clear EE-3
n-H: E acetate 30:70 5 No spot EE-4
n-H: E acetate 20:80 6 No spot EE-5
n-H: E acetate 0:100 7 No spot EE-6

n-H: E acetate (n-Hexane: Ethyl acetate)

Characterization of Isolated Compound

The thin-layer chromatography examination of the Linum usitatissimum extract was completed using a solvent system consisting of Ethanol: Ethyl acetate in a fraction of (90:10) v/v/v). A single spot was observed on the TLC plate, exhibiting a light brown color. The retention factor (Rf) value for this spot was calculated to be 0.52.

Figure 1 displayed many peaks in the FTIR of the isolated chemical LPCP.  According to Figure 2, the 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ values are 7.57 (2H d, J = 15.8 hertz, OH), 7.47 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, CH), 6.83 (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, CH), and 6.32 (2H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H). IR (KBr) Vmax: O-H stretching ranges from -3400-3100 cm-1; O-H stretching 3339 cm-1; C=O stretching 1634 cm-1; C-O stretching 1153 cm-1.

13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 168.68 (s), 160.08 (s), 144.81 (s), 130.51 (s), 125.86 (s), 116.35 (s), 115.81 (s), 39.50 (d, J = 21.0 Hz), 39.29 (s) (Figure 3).

Mass spectroscopy of active compound LUE had the chemical formula C9H8O3 based on ES-MS data m/z 163.04 [M+], and determined molecular weight was 164.04 (Figure 4). Compound LUE was identified as p-Coumaric acid by comparison of the physical parameters, IR, Mass, The presented data along with 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data (Figure 5).

Figure 1: FTIR spectrum of the isolated compound (p-coumaric acid) showing characteristic absorption peaks.

Click here to View Figure

Major peaks include: A broad O–H stretching vibration at ~3400–3100 cm⁻¹; A sharp peak at 1634 cm⁻¹ indicating C=O stretching; A distinct C–O stretching vibration at 1153 cm⁻¹; These signals confirm the presence of phenolic hydroxyl and carboxylic acid functional groups.

Figure 2: ¹H NMR spectrum (500 MHz, DMSO) of the isolated compound (p-coumaric acid).

Click here to View Figure

Key signals include: δ 7.57 ppm (2H, d, J = 15.8 Hz, OH protons); δ 7.47 ppm (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, aromatic CH); – δ 6.83 ppm (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, aromatic CH); δ 6.32 ppm (2H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, vinylic CH); These signals correspond to the characteristic hydrogens of the coumaric acid backbone.

Figure 3: 13C NMR spectrum (126 MHz, DMSO) of the isolated compound (p-coumaric acid).

Click here to View Figure

Prominent carbon signals observed at: δ 168.68 (C=O carbon); δ 160.08, 144.81, 130.51, 125.86, 116.35, 115.81 (aromatic ring carbons); δ 39.50, 39.29 (aliphatic or side chain carbons); These values support the structure of p-coumaric acid.

Figure 4: LC-MS spectrum of the isolated compound (p-coumaric acid).


Click here to View Figure

LC-MS spectrum of the isolated compound (p-coumaric acid). The mass spectrum shows a molecular ion peak at m/z 163.04 [M+H]⁺, which corresponds to the expected molecular weight of 164.04 g/mol. This confirms the molecular formula C₉H₈O₃, validating the compound’s identity as p-coumaric acid based on molecular mass and fragmentation pattern.

Figure 5: Structure of isolated compound

Click here to View Figure

Molecular Docking

The molecular docking simulation revealed that the isolated compound, p-coumaric acid, showed significant binding affinity toward the NF-κB protein. The docking score was calculated as −5.299, with an XP GScore of −5.299, indicating a strong and stable interaction within the binding pocket. The compound formed three hydrogen bonds with critical amino acid residues in the active site: TYR251, SER288, and LYS221, with bond lengths ranging from 1.87 Å to 2.67 Å. Additionally, the Emodel energy of −36.191 and the Glide energy of −35.624 further confirmed the ligand’s stability and favorable binding conformation. These findings suggest that p-coumaric acid may act as a potential natural inhibitor of NF-κB, thereby contributing to its observed antioxidant activity. A two-dimensional interaction diagram revealed polar interactions and hydrogen bonding with the aforementioned residues, while the 3D binding pose visualized through Maestro confirmed the compound’s snug fit within the receptor site, mimicking native ligand interactions (Figure 6). Table 3 demonstrated the docking of ligands in the dataset along with amino acid interactions and count using glide grid sore.

Table 3: Molecular Docking score of isolated compounds

Compound Dock score

XP GScore

No of H-bonds Interacting amino acids Hydrogen bond lengths (Å) Emodel energy Glide energy
p-coumaric acid -5.299 3 TYE 251

SER 288

LYS 221

2.11

1.87

2.67

-36.191 -35.624

 

Figure 6: Molecular docking interaction of p-coumaric acid with NF-κB (PDB ID: 1IKN) as visualized using Schrodinger Glide XP mode

Click here to View Figure

The ligand forms three hydrogen bonds with active site residues: TYR251 (2.11 Å); SER288 (1.87 Å); LYS221 (2.67 Å). These interactions suggest stable binding and support the compound’s potential as a natural NF-κB inhibitor.

Antioxidant Evaluation

DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

The antioxidant potential of the isolated compound was evaluated using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl test for scavenging free radicals (Figure 7). The absorbance value recorded for the compound was 0.234, which was used to calculate its RSA and TEAC. The RSA was determined to be 2.90, indicating moderate free radical scavenging ability. Additionally, the concentration of Trolox Equivalent (CTE) was calculated to be 31.67 μg/mL, while the TEAC value was found to be 8.05 μmol/mg, reflecting the compound’s antioxidant capacity relative to the standard antioxidant, Trolox (Table 4).

Figure 7: DPPH free radical scavenging assay for Trolox

Click here to View Figure

Table 4: Calculated RSA and TEAC of samples using recorded absorbance and trendline question of standard

S.No. Type Sample Absorbance RAS (%) CTE (μg/ml) TEAC (μmol/mg)
1. Sample LPCP 0.234 2.90 31.67 8.05

Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity, Radical Scavenging Activity

ABTS Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC)

The free radical activity potential of the isolated compound was evaluated by use of the ABTS test for free radical scavenging. The scavenging activity was calculated based on the absorbance values recorded at 734 nanometre and the trendline equation obtained from the standard (Trolox) (Figure 8). The results are summarized in Table 5, where the RSA, TEAC, and CTE were determined for the isolated compound. The isolated compound exhibited an absorbance of 0.674, which corresponds to an RSA of 1.606%. The calculated CTE was 1.307μg/mL, and the TEAC value was found to be 4.698 μmol/mg, highlighting the compound’s antioxidant capacity relative to the Trolox standard.

Figure 8: ABTS free radical scavenging assay for Trolox

Click here to View Figure

Table 5: Calculated RSA and TEAC of samples using recorded absorbances and trendline equation of standard

  S. No Type Sample code Absorbance RAS (%) CTE (μg/ml) TEAC

(μmol/mg)

 

1. Sample LPCP 0.674 1.606 1.307 4.698

Reactive Scavenging Activity (RSA) and Trolox equivalent capacity for antioxidants (TEAC).

Discussion

The current work investigates the antioxidant potential of an isolated bioactive phytoconstituent, i.e., p-coumaric acid, from the seed of Linum usitatissimum. While the component was further clarified utilizing spectral approaches, including FTIR, NMR, and LC-MS, Soxhlet extraction with ethanol followed by extraction produced 39.15%.  All of these analytical procedures verified the integrity and identification of the chemical in line with results from earlier studies confirming identical phytoconstituents present in flaxseed11,20. According to some studies, a wide range of bioactive chemicals, including phenolics, flavonoids, & lignans, accounts for most of flaxseed’s antioxidant activity5,8.   Reflecting a notable degree of flavonoid antioxidants, the molecule identified in this work had a total flavonoid content (TFC) of 2.1 mg QE/g.  These findings are consistent with previous studies indicating that ethanol-extracted flaxseed, which is known to be an efficient solvent for phenolic compounds, has a high concentration of flavonoids and lignans19,20. The antioxidant activity of the isolated molecule was also evaluated using DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging tests. While the ABTS test produced a TEAC of 4.698 µmol/mg and an RSA of 1.606%, the DPPH test produced an RSA of 2.90% and a Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) of 8.05 µmol/mg. Though less potent than synthetic antioxidants or more complex phytochemical combinations, these compounds’ partial antioxidant activities show that they help to reduce oxidative stress20. Molecular docking was done using the Schrodinger software suite in an effort to understand the molecular mechanism of its antioxidant activity. With a docking score of -5.299, the chemical exhibited good hydrogen bonding interactions with important amino acid residues such TYR251, SER288, and LYS221, as well as strong binding potential to the NFκB (PDB ID: 1IKN). These results suggest that by keeping p-coumaric acid in its latent phase, it may prevent NFκB activation, hence reducing the inflammatory and oxidative reaction. Further computational and experimental data in plant antioxidants aimed at the NF-kB pathway supports this outcome9. All things considered, the study supports the idea that via altering oxidative stress pathways at the molecular level and scavenging free radicals, flaxseed phenolics, especially p-coumaric acid, may be influencing antioxidant defense systems.  Docketing information increases the relevance of the chemical by offering a mechanistic justification for its claimed antioxidant action. These results are in line with previous studies that have reported the high antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of flaxseed extracts, especially those that contain phenolic and flavonoid contents5,7,20. Soxhlet extraction, the extraction method utilized, was also efficient and produced a more concentrated bioactive than traditional maceration methods. As has been seen before in similar studies of oilseed crops, the high extraction rate is due to heat-assisted diffusion and improved penetration of the solvent12,19.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study confirms that p-coumaric acid, isolated from the seeds of Linum usitatissimum, exhibits moderate antioxidant potential and favorable binding affinity toward NF-κB, a central regulator of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. The combined application of in vitro antioxidant assays and in silico molecular docking underscores its dual role as a free radical scavenger and a prospective modulator of inflammatory pathways. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of flaxseed-derived phenolic compounds in the development of nutraceuticals and natural anti-inflammatory agents. Furthermore, the study reinforces the utility of computational tools in unraveling molecular mechanisms of bioactive compounds.

Future investigations will aim to assess the in vivo efficacy of p-coumaric acid in models of oxidative stress and inflammation. Additional studies will also focus on its pharmacokinetic profile, bioavailability, and the potential development of formulations for use as a dietary supplement or plant-based therapeutic agent. 

Acknowledgement

This research was a part of Ph.D. Program of Teerthanker University, Moradabad. Also, authors thanks to Prof Anurag Verma, Prof Mayur Porwal and Prof Vaibhav Rastogi for their help and support for the publication of the manuscript.

Funding Sources

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) do not have any conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

This statement does not apply to this article.

Ethics Statement

This research did not involve human participants, animal subjects, or any material that requires ethical approval.

Authors Contributions

Sunaina: Original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis.

Phool Chandra: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Software, Writing – review & editing, Supervision 

References

  1. Koçak, M. Z.; Kumlay, A. M.; Alma, M. H. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Flax (Linum Usitatissimum L.) Accessions Obtained from Different Locations in Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2023, 70 (8), 2235–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10722-023-01589-6.
    CrossRef
  2. Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Sun, R.; Zhai, X. Unveiling the Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Approaches for Diabetic Nephropathy: Insights from Panvascular Diseases. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2024, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENDO.2024.1368481/FULL.
    CrossRef
  3. Bilen, Y.; Almoushref, A.; Alkwatli, K.; Osman, O.; Mehdi, A.; Sawaf, H. Treatment and Practical Considerations of Diabetic Kidney Disease. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2023, 10, 1264497. https://doi.org/10.3389/ FMED.2023.1264497/BIBTEX.
    CrossRef
  4. Viswanathan, V.; Mirshad, R. The Burden of Diabetic Nephropathy in India: Need for Prevention. Diabetic Nephropathy 2023, 3 (2), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/DINE-2023-0003/HTML.
    CrossRef
  5. Kauser, S.; Hussain, A.; Ashraf, S.; Fatima, G.; Ambreen; Javaria, S.; Abideen, Z. U.; Kabir, K.; Yaqub, S.; Akram, S.; Shehzad, A.; Korma, S. A. Flaxseed (Linum Usitatissimum); Phytochemistry, Pharmacological Characteristics and Functional Food Applications. Food Chemistry Advances 2024, 4, 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2023. 100573.
    CrossRef
  6. Wang, J.; Huang, D.; Yu, H.; Cheng, Y.; Ren, H.; Zhao, Y. Developing Tissue Engineering Strategies for Liver Regeneration. Engineered Regeneration 2022, 3 (1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2022.02.003.
    CrossRef
  7. Akter, Y.; Junaid, Md.; Afrose, S. S.; Nahrin, A.; Alam, M. S.; Sharmin, T.; Akter, R.; Hosen, S. M. Z. A Comprehensive Review on Linum Usitatissimum Medicinal Plant: Its Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Ethnomedicinal Uses. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem.2021, 21 (18), 2801–2834. https://doi.org/10.2174/138955752166 6210203153436.
    CrossRef
  8. Sarwar, A. K. M. G.; Haque, Md. E.; Khatun, Most. M.; Haque, Md. S. Agro-Morphological Characterization of Flax (Linum Usitatissimum L.) Accessions at North-Western Part of Bangladesh. Arch. Agri. Environ. Sci. 2020, 5 (4), 465–469.
    CrossRef
  9. Zamanian, M. Y.; Alsaab, H. O.; Golmohammadi, M.; Yumashev, A.; Jabba, A. M.; Abid, M. K.; Joshi, A.; Alawadi, A. H.; Jafer, N. S.; Kianifar, F.; Obakiro, S. B. NF-ΚB Pathway as a Molecular Target for Curcumin in Diabetes Mellitus Treatment: Focusing on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2024, 42 (4). https://doi.org/10.1002/CBF.4030.
    CrossRef
  10. Huang, S. C.; Kao, J. H. Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Chronic Hepatitis B. J. Formosan Med. Ass. 2022, 121 (11), 2148–2151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2022.07.013.
    CrossRef
  11. Patyra, A.; Kołtun-Jasion, M.; Jakubiak, O.; Kiss, A. K. Extraction Techniques and Analytical Methods for Isolation and Characterization of Lignans. Plants 2022, Vol. 11, Page 2323 2022, 11 (17), 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/PLANTS11172323.
    CrossRef
  12. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Dong, G.; Chen, X.; Wang, S.; Lei, F.; Su, X.; Bai, Q. Effect of Different Extraction Methods on Quality Characteristics of Rapeseed and Flaxseed Oils. J. Food. Qual. 2022, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8296212.
    CrossRef
  13. Müller, I.; Gulde, A.; Morlock, G. E. Bioactive Profiles of Edible Vegetable Oils Determined Using 10D Hyphenated Comprehensive High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC×HPTLC) with on-Surface Metabolism (NanoGIT) and Planar Bioassays. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNUT.2023.1227546/FULL.
    CrossRef
  14. Hu, Y.; Tse, T. J.; Shim, Y. Y.; Purdy, S. K.; Kim, Y. J.; Meda, V.; Reaney, M. J. T. A Review of Flaxseed Lignan and the Extraction and Refinement of Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside. Crit. Rev. Food. Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64 (15), 5057–5072. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2148627.
    CrossRef
  15. Bajpai, P.; Chandra, P. Relevance of Conventional Herbal Remedies in the Prevention and Treatment of Malignant Tumors: Looking Toward the Future. Curr. Cancer. Ther. Rev. 2024, 21 (1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733947266657231114075805.
    CrossRef
  16. Chandra, P.; RoomiKhan; Sachan, N.; Halawi, M.; Alsaiari, A. A.; Almehmadi, M.; Kamal, M.; Jawaid, T.; Asif, M. Protective Effect of Zingiber Officinale Rhizomes Against Experimental Induced Ulcers in Diabetic Rats. Pharm. Chem. J. 2022, 56 (8), 1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02760-6.
    CrossRef
  17. Starek, M.; Homa, K.; Stępińska, J.; Dąbrowska, M. Development of Thin-Layer Chromatography‒densitometry for the Quantification of Lecithin in Dietary Supplements. J. Planar Chrom. – Modern TLC 2023, 36 (2–3), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00764-023-00234-3.
    CrossRef
  18. Huang, X.; Wang, N.; Ma, Y.; Liu, X.; Guo, H.; Song, L.; Zhao, Q.; Hai, D.; Cheng, Y.; Bai, G.; Guo, Q. Flaxseed Polyphenols: Effects of Varieties on Its Composition and Antioxidant Capacity. Food. Chem. X 2024, 23, 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOCHX.2024.101597.
    CrossRef
  19. Pramanik, J.; Kumar, A.; Prajapati, B. A Review on Flaxseeds: Nutritional Profile, Health Benefits, Value Added Products, and Toxicity. eFood 2023, 4 (5). https://doi.org/10.1002/EFD2.114.
    CrossRef
  20. Huang, L.; Huang, X. H.; Yang, X.; Hu, J. Q.; Zhu, Y. Z.; Yan, P. Y.; Xie, Y. Novel Nano-Drug Delivery System for Natural Products and Their Application. Pharmacol. Res. 2024, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107100.
    CrossRef

Article Metrics
Views PlumX: 
Views Views:  648 Views
PDF Downloads PDF Downloads:  433

Article Publishing History
Received on: 15 Apr 2025
Accepted on: 11 Nov 2025

Article Review Details
Reviewed by: Dr. Vijaya Bhargavi
Second Review by: Dr. Rohit Singh
Final Approval by: Dr. Abdelwahab Omri


Share


Journal is Indexed in

Cabells Whitelist


Journal Archived in: