ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

A Comparative Study on the Removal Technologies of Acetylsalicylic Acid from Water

Rekhapalli Sri Shreya1 and Geetha Kannan2

1Department of Chemical Engineering, Dubai Campus, Birla instate of technology and science Pilani

2Department of General Sciences, Dubai Campus, Birla instate of technology and science Pilani India

Corresponding author Email: rsshreya@yahoo.co.in

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/330660

Article Publishing History
Article Received on :
Article Accepted on :
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

Over the recent past, there has been a growing concern regarding the sources and effects of pharmaceutical products in the water bodies. Improper disposal of these medications have resulted in their accumulation in the environment and has eventually led to them contaminating the waters. The most common pollutant is aspirin and in this study, comparative treatment methods of aspirin in water were performed to identify the most suitable ,simple and cost effective quantitative method for its removal.. The treatability of aspirin by Ozonation, Aeration, Adsorption, and Photocatalytic degradation were studied in batch processes and parameters influencing the process were optimized.

KEYWORDS:

Aspirin; salicylic acid; treatment methods; pharmaceutical pollution; aeration; adsorption; ozonation; photocatalysis

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Shreya R. S, Kannan G. A Comparative Study on the Removal Technologies of Acetylsalicylic Acid from Water. Orient J Chem 2017;33(6).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Shreya R. S, Kannan G. A Comparative Study on the Removal Technologies of Acetylsalicylic Acid from Water. Orient J Chem 2017;33(6). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=40923


Introduction

Over the past two to three decades, there has been a huge growth in the Global Pharmaceutical Market and a tremendous rise in the production of pharmaceuticals, owing to better health care facilities and medical advancements. A large number of drugs are ‘over-the-counter’ to which the general public has easy access. Excessive buying of medications, their improper disposal and general ignorance has led to their contamination in the environment. In a study done by the US Geological Survey, one of more of 95 chemicals tested for, which included but were not limited to pharmaceuticals and insect repellants, were found in 80% of streams samples.[1]

All such drugs and their residues find their way into the water bodies and ultimately pose a threat to the organisms living in there and the ecosystem containing those water systems, and even show a potential threat to humans.[1]

A lack of understanding and experience over the decades has contributed to the ecotoxicity already present in the environment, and the past few years have exhibited a dangerous trend in how these pollutants affect the environment in which they are present. Several classes of drugs have been detected in recent years in different regions and water bodies [2]. These contaminants have found their way into our drinking water as well. Statistical data has shown the most commonly found pharmaceutical contaminants in the environment to be non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and amongst this class, acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is a regular pollutant[3]. The presence of NSAIDs in the environment has caused a damaging impact on other species. In fish and birds, NSAIDs have led to renal failure, poor egg shell quality, and imbalance in the sex ratios of certain fish[4]. Most of these pharmaceutical pollutants originate from households, hospitals and nursing homes, and the effluents of drug manufacturing industries mainly due to improper disposal. [5] Previous research consists of treatment methods for the removal of antibiotics and antidepressants from wastewater. Amongst NSAIDs, studies have been conducted on the purifying waters containing ibuprofen, diclofenac, carbamazapine[6] and naproxen[7]. The removal technologies of acetylsalicylic acid from water are still under study. Research includes, removal of aspirin by advanced membrane technology, activated charcoal and clay micelles complex [4] and mechanism of acetylsalicylic aicd degradation under solar light in the presence of titanium dioxide polymeric film photocatalyst[8]. Further availability of information is limited as this is a recent and ongoing study.

Experimental Analysis

Pure aspirin was prepared in the laboratory and UV-Spectrophotometry was used for the estimation of aspirin and the calibration studies. A standard stock solution of aspirin of 1600 ppm was used for all the studies. UV-Spectrophotometry method obeyed the Beer Lambert Law in the concentration range of 0-128 ppm at 267 nm. The detection limit and molar absorptivity were found to be 6 ppm and 922.22 L mol-1 cm-1 respectively.

Table 1: Calibration of Aspirin using UV-Spectrophotometry

S.No

Concentration

(µg/5mL)

Absorbance

(Abs)

1

32

0.172±0.005

2

64

0.332±0.004

3

96

0.488±0.022

4

128

0.657±0.017

 

Figure 1: Calibration Curve for Aspirin by UV-Spectrophotometry Figure 1: Calibration Curve for Aspirin by UV-Spectrophotometry 

Click here to View figure

 

Treatment Methods for the removal/transformation/degradation of Acetylsalicylic Acid

The characteristics of acetylsalicylic acid must be analyzed in order to decide on what treatment methods are suitable for its removal from water. [9]The following data provides information on what kind of treatment methods would be useful and appropriate as far as aspirin is concerned.

Table 2: Theoretically Suitable Methods of Treatment for Aspirin based on its Characteristics

Method of Treatment

Parameter

Characteristics of Aspirin

Considerability

Absorption

Log Kow  > 4.0

Hydrophobic

Log Kow  = 1.426

Hydrophilic

Not considered

Adsorption

Electrostatic Interactions

Releases negative ions in aqueous medium.

Considered

Ozonation

Reacts with aromatic compounds with high electron densities

Aromatic compound.

Has high electron density in ortho position due to electron withdrawing group.

Considered

Photocatalysis

Biodegradability and Mineralization

Can be mineralized to form CO2 and H2O

Considered

Aeration

 

Of the many treatment methods practiced in waste water treatment plants, four were found to be theoretically suitable for this comparative study on the treatment of aspirin, namely: Ozonation, Batch Adsorption, Aeration and Photocatalysis.

Aeration

The effect of aeration was studied under the influence of three different conditions:

Aerial Oxidation under Ambient Conditions

A known volume and concentration of acetylsalicylic acid solution was taken in a 250 mL beaker and kept aside for analysis of the effect of simple aerial oxidation under ambient conditions. The following results were observed.

 Figure 2: Effect of Aerial Oxidation (under ambient conditions) on Acetylsalicylic Acid Figure 2: Effect of Aerial Oxidation (under ambient conditions) on Acetylsalicylic Acid 

Click here to View figure

 

Figure 3: UV Graphs - Conversion of aspirin (left peak) into salicylic acid (right peak) Figure 3: UV Graphs – Conversion of aspirin (left peak) into salicylic acid (right peak) 

Click here to View figure

 

Aeration using an Air Pump

A sample solution of aspirin of known volume and concentration (50 mL) was taken in a beaker. Air was bubbled through the solution using an air pump. An hourly analysis was made for a span of 8 hours and the following results were obtained.

Figure 4: Aeration Treatment using Pump Figure 4: Aeration Treatment using Pump 

Click here to View table

 

Figure 5: Aspirin absorbance decreasing from 0.448 to 0.382 at 267 nm Figure 5: Aspirin absorbance decreasing from 0.448 to 0.382 at 267 nm 

Click here to View figure

 

Aerial Oxidation under the influence of Increasing Temperature Ranges

The effect of increasing temperature ranges during aerial oxidation was studied for six acetylsalicylic acid samples of known volume and concentration. Each sample was kept for 20 minutes in a water bath that was maintained at a certain range of temperature and the whole process lasted for a total of two hours. The following table provides the results of this experiment:

Figure 6: Graphs showing the transformation of aspirin (left peak) into salicylic acid (right peak) in different temperature ranges during 20 minutes Figure 6: Graphs showing the transformation of aspirin (left peak) into salicylic acid (right peak) in different temperature ranges during 20 minutes 

Click here to View figure

 

Figure 7: Aerial Oxidation under the Influence of Increasing Temperatures Figure 7: Aerial Oxidation under the Influence of Increasing Temperatures 

Click here to View figure

 

Ozonation

Sample solutions of known volume and concentration containing acetylsalicylic acid were treated by the passage of ozone through them for 10 minutes.

Table 3: Percentage Reduction via Ozonation

Sample Number

Percentage Degradation (%)

1

0.619

2

2.303

3

2.201

4

7.143

 

Adsorption

For adsorption, various samples of aspirin solution were tested and the parameters involved were varied. pH was varied from 4 to 7, weight of carbon from 0.03 grams-0.1 grams and time from 1-4 hours. All experiments were performed in a triplicate manner to determine the reliability of the method and the optimal results were chosen. A pH of 4, carbon weight of 0.05 grams and time duration of 2 hours showed the best results. For PAC and GAC that were commercial carbons, the pH was altered to 4 using an acetate buffer. For the date seed carbons produced in acidic and basic media, pH was not altered in order to study the adsorptive capacity of the carbons of such media. Batch adsorption was carried out for all four types of carbons for two hours and their optimal results were measured:

Figure 8: Comparative Results showing Optimal Percentage Change obtained by different Carbons Figure 8: Comparative Results showing Optimal Percentage Change obtained by different Carbons 

Click here to View figure

 

Photocatalysis

A known volume and concentration of a sample solution of acetylsalicylic acid was taken (1600 ppm) in a beaker. Titanium dioxide was used as the photocatalyst. The weight of Ti02 and pH of the medium were optimized. 0.4grams of titanium dioxide catalyst was introduced to the solution and was allowed to settle. The pH of the sample was altered to 4. The beaker was kept in open sunlight for 4-5 hours and the sample was analyzed for changes on an hourly basis. The following observations were made:

Figure 9: Graph depicting a decrease in acetylsalicylic acid by 38.18% (upper peak to lower peak) Figure 9: Graph depicting a decrease in acetylsalicylic acid by 38.18% (upper peak to lower peak) 

Click here to View figure

 

Figure 10: Graph showing Aspirin’s Degradation in 4 hours Figure 10: Graph showing Aspirin’s Degradation in 4 hours 

Click here to View figure

 

Results

For aeration, under ambient conditions aspirin took nearly 4 days to completely transform into salicylic acid. There is a gradual shift in the shoulder from acetylsalicylic acid to salicylic acid; i.e. from λ=267nm (represents acetylsalicylic acid) to λ=295nm (represents salicylic acid). After day 4, there is no longer a peak in the wavelength range of 267nm. There is only a single peak at λ=295nm implying complete conversion of acetylsalicylic acid into salicylic acid. In 4 days, acetylsalicylic acid had almost completely transformed into salicylic acid. Acetylsalicylic acid began to transform into salicylic acid during a span of 8 hours when air was bubbled through the solution using an air pump. In a span of 8 hours, aeration treatment could reduce/modify the amount of acetylsalicylic acid present in the sample by approximately 15%. In practical situations, aeration is performed for approximately 6 hours. This study shows that acetylsalicylic acid would be relatively stable or undergo minimal transformation into salicylic acid during that time period. Under the influence of temperature, in samples 1-4, the UV-Spectrophotometric analysis showed a gradual shift in the wavelength from acetylsalicylic acid to salicylic acid. The wavelength shifted from λ=267nm (at room temperature) to λ=276nm when subjected to increased temperatures (between 35-65°C). The peak of acetylsalicylic acid began to decrease and that of salicylic acid began to increase. In samples 5 and 6, there was no longer a peak for acetylsalicylic acid. Only one peak remained which corresponded to salicylic acid, i.e, λmax=295nm. The 6th sample shows a decrease in the absorbance from the 5th by approximately 0.1, indicating that salicylic acid was beginning to decompose/breakdown at that temperature. A further increase in temperature would lead to complete decomposition of salicylic acid.

The results obtained by ozonation showed change of the contaminant drug by 2-7%. The pale yellow color formed indicates the occurrence of a reaction producing an aromatic compound (possibly quinine) which absorbs in the same wavelength range as that of aspirin and accommodates numerically whatever change/reduction of aspirin that had taken place. This implies that Ozonation is not a useful method for treating Acetylsalicylic acid contaminants in water.

0.1g of PAC showed a lesser adsorption value than 0.05g because the adsorptive capacity of the adsorbent available was not fully utilized at a higher adsorbent dosage in comparison to lower adsorbent dosage. The increase in the adsorbent dose might cause aggregation of adsorbent, and consequently, the available adsorption sites might decrease. Therefore, it might be possible that adsorption capacity decreases as adsorbent dosage increases. Maintaining constant parameters of pH, time and weight of carbons used, the optimal results have been summarized as followed.

Figure 11: Over a span of four to five hours, the photocatalysis treatment with titanium dioxide could degrade the drug by 71%. This proves that TiO2¬ is a reliable substance for photocatalysis in the removal/modification of acetylsalicylic acid. Figure 11: Over a span of four to five hours, the photocatalysis treatment with titanium dioxide could degrade the drug by 71%. This proves that TiO is a reliable substance for photocatalysis in the removal/modification of acetylsalicylic acid. 

Click here to View figure

 

Discussion

Theoretically, aeration alone was expected to show substantial results. However, experimentally, it was not so. Aerial oxidation under ambient conditions managed to transform aspirin into salicylic acid over a period of 4-5 days. Aeration using a pump to pass air directly into the solution helped transform the aspirin into salicylic acid by 15% in a span of 8 hours. Aerial oxidation required the presence of high temperatures for complete conversion of the aspirin to occur. This worked best at a temperature range of 75-85ºC where acetylsalicylic acid was completely transformed into salicylic acid within 20 minutes. Further treatment methods needed to be explored in order to ensure the reduction of the content of aspirin in water.

Ozonation did not prove useful as there were reactions occurring that caused the production of other aromatic compounds like quinone which absorb in the same wavelength range as aspirin and hence the change in aspirin could not be monitored and the possible reduction in aspirin could not be estimated.

Adsorption was considered as the next treatment method and showed encouraging results. In terms of the best type of carbon, powdered activated carbon showed the best results with an adsorptive capacity of approximately 80%. Since adsorption is an interaction of charges, this is a useful method as the charges on the adsorbent and adsorbate could be manipulated to enhance adsorptive capacity. If the surface of the adsorbent, activated carbon is neutral or near basic in nature, that is, if it has surface neutral or negative charges, then maximum adsorption would be obtained if the aspirin solution medium is buffered to be acidic and maintained at pH 4 (so that positive ions dominate) which is the optimal pH for aspirin adsorption on this adsorbent.

If the surface of the carbon adsorbent has positive charges, it is best to not use a buffer so that the negative ions released by aspirin could dominate and enhance electrostatic interactions.

Photocatalysis of acetylsalicylic acid using Titanium dioxide showed that it is possible to degrade aspirin into salicylic acid which is further mineralizable. The highest photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide is achieved in an acidic medium of pH 4 for aspirin. There is substantial breakdown of the drug into salicylic acid in a short span of time; that is, four to five hours.

Conclusion

This comparative study of removal technologies for aspirin shows that adsorption using powdered activated carbon at its optimal conditions as mentioned, and photocatalysis using titanium dioxide in an acidic medium are the most effective methods amongst the rest of the processes practiced. These treatment technologies can be applied to other pharmaceutical compounds that share similar chemical characteristics and properties as that of acetylsalicylic acid.

The significance of this study lies in the cost-effectiveness and simplicity in the methodology of these treatment processes. Activated carbon is an easily available and immensely reliable adsorbent for the adsorption of chemicals like aspirin. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis is a state-of-the-art pharmaceutical wastewater treatment methodology and is already in use as a promising treatment technology for water purification. Substantial results can be obtained on an industrial level when these processes are directed towards the treatment of pharmaceutical pollutants in water.

References

  1. Heberer, T. Toxicology Letters. 2002, 131, 5-17
    CrossRef
  2. Benotti, M.J.; Trenholm, R.A.; Vanderford, B.J.;  Holady, J.C.;  Stanford, B.D.;  Snyder, S.A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 597-603
    CrossRef
  3. Heberer, T.; Reddersen, K.; Mechlinski, A. Water Sci.Technol. 2002, 46, 81–88
    CrossRef
  4. Arcand Hoy, L.D.; Nimrod, A.C.; Benson, W.H. Int. J. Toxicol. 1998, 17, 139-158
    CrossRef
  5. SeehusenD. A.EdwardsJ. J. Am. Board. Fam. Pract. 2002, 19, 542–547
    CrossRef
  6. Zhang, Y.; Geiben, S.; Gal, C. Chemosphere. 2008, 73, 1151-1161
    CrossRef
  7. Ternes, T.A.; Meisenheimer, M.; McDowell, D.; Sacher, F.; Brauch, H.J.;, Haist-Gulde, B.; Preuss, G.; Wilme, U.; Zulei-Seibert, N. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3855-3863
    CrossRef
  8. Hashimoto, K.; Irie, H.; Fujishima, A. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 2-6
  9. Jones, O.A.H.; Voulvoulis, N.; Lester, J.N. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 35, 401-427
    CrossRef


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.