ISSN : 0970 - 020X, ONLINE ISSN : 2231-5039
     FacebookTwitterLinkedinMendeley

Tin Oxide Nanoparticles Produced by Spark Ablation: Synthesis and Gas Sensing Properties

Alexey Efimov1*, Ivan Volkov1, Andrey Varfolomeev1,2, Alexey Vasiliev1,2 and Victor Ivanov1

1Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region, Russia.

2NRC Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia.

Corresponding Author E-mail: efimov.aa@mipt.ru.

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/320609

Article Publishing History
Article Received on :
Article Accepted on :
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

The synthesis parameters and results of investigation of gas sensing properties of tin oxide nanoparticles produced by spark ablation are presented. The nanoparticles have sizes below 30 nm and their specific surface area is about 40 m2/g. In order to study the gas sensing properties, a special structure comprising heater, barrier layers and contact pads was utilized. The resistance of the sensor fabricated on the basis of this structure was measured at different concentrations of hydrogen in the air (100–500 ppm) and different values of relative humidity (30–80%). At working temperature of 450°C, 100 ppm of hydrogen triggers more than 8-times decrease in the sensor resistance within the time interval of about 1 s. At the same time, the humidity variation does not have pronounced effect on the sensor resistance: less than 30% in the humidity range studied.

KEYWORDS:

Tin oxide; Gas sensor; Spark ablation; Multi-spark discharge generator

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Efimov A, Volkov I, Varfolomeev A, Vasiliev A, Ivanov V. Tin Oxide Nanoparticles Produced by Spark Ablation: Synthesis and Gas Sensing Properties. Orient J Chem 2016;32(6).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Efimov A, Volkov I, Varfolomeev A, Vasiliev A, Ivanov V. Tin Oxide Nanoparticles Produced by Spark Ablation: Synthesis and Gas Sensing Properties. Orient J Chem 2016;32(6). Available from: http://www.orientjchem.org/?p=25507


Introduction

Currently, the metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors are widely used for gas analysis1–4. They are relatively inexpensive compared to other sensing technologies and benefit from high material sensitivity and quick response times1,2. The operating principle of these sensors is based on the change in conductivity of the sensitive layer by the chemical adsorption of gas molecules3. Typically, the metal oxides semiconductors (SnO2, In2O3, WO3, ZnO, etc.) are used to create sensitive layers1,2. Traditional methods of synthesis of metal oxide gas sensing materials for semiconductor sensors are based on wet sol-gel processes2,4. However, these processes lead to the formation of hydroxyl groups on the surface of oxide particles being responsible for the strong response of a sensing material to the humidity3,4. In this regard, researchers are developing alternative methods of synthesis of nanoparticles such as the spark5 and laser ablation6, flame synthesis7, electrical explosion of wire8,9, etc. In this group of methods, the spark ablation is probably the most promising method for the synthesis of chemically pure nanoparticles with a small size of primary particle less than 10 nm10.

In this work, the possibility of producing tin oxide nanoparticles by spark ablation was investigated. The gas sensing properties of the synthesized material were studied by using hydrogen as an analyte.

Experimental

Material and methods

The gas sensing material was synthesized by spark discharge. In this work, we used a custom-built multi-spark discharge generator11 containing 12 pairs of serially connected cylindrical electrodes powered by a 12-nF capacitor charged by a high-voltage source (Fig. 1). The electrodes made of pure tin (purity ~ 99.95%) with a nominal diameter of 6 mm were aligned axially at a distance of 0.5 mm and blown out continuously by the dry (relative humidity of 20–30%) and clean air at a flow rate of ~ 300 l/min. The optimum values of the source output voltage and the pulse repetition frequency providing reasonable combination of the mean size (< 100 nm) and the production rate (> 1 g/h) of airborne nanoparticles were found to be 4.5 kV and 2.5 kHz, respectively. The airborne nanoparticles were deposited onto the air filter made of porous stainless steel. In order to reduce the metallic phase content, the as-synthesized powder was annealed in air atmosphere as follows: 1) heating up to 610°C at a constant rate of ~ 5 K/min.; 2) keeping 610°C for 2 h.

Figure 1: Scheme of the multi-spark discharge generator.

Figure 1: Scheme of the multi-spark discharge generator.



Click here to View figure

 

The sensing ink was prepared by mortar mixing of pure SnO2 powder (without any catalyst decoration) with a solution of ethyl cellulose in terpineol. The ink droplet was deposited onto the sensor chip by dispensing. The ink was dried at 300°C (15 min.) and then fired at 720°C for 15 min. The scheme of the gas sensor is presented in Fig. 2. The gas detection mechanism of the sensor is based on the reversible change in the conductivity of SnO2 particles/grains induced by gas-solid interaction12.

Figure 2: Scheme of the gas sensor.

Figure 2: Scheme of the gas sensor.

 

Click here to View figure

The phase composition of produced materials was retrieved from X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra measured with Bruker D8 DISCOVER. The particle size distribution was determined from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images obtained with JEOL JEM-2100. The specific surface area was estimated by BET method with the use of Micromeritics TriStar 3000. Gas sensitivity was studied using Microgas-F setup.

Figure 3: TEM images of annealed nanoparticles at different magnifications (a and b), electron diffraction pattern (inset of figure a), and particle size distribution (inset of figure b). Figure 3: TEM images of annealed nanoparticles at different magnifications (a and b), electron diffraction pattern (inset of figure a), and particle size distribution (inset of figure b).

Click here to View figure

Result and Discussion

It was found from XRD phase analysis that the annealed (610°C) powder contains only SnO2 phase (> 98%) and traces of unidentified phases. It is represented by near-spherical and slightly elongated particles (Fig. 3) possessing certain surface faceting. According to the electron diffraction patterns (insets of Figs. 3a), particles have a crystalline structure; it is also evidenced by TEM images at high magnification (Fig. 3b). The corresponding histogram is well described by log-normal distribution with the modal size of about 15 nm (inset of Fig. 3b). The specific surface area of nanoparticles is found to be about 40 m2/g. These values are well correlated with the size parameters retrieved from TEM images.

Sensor resistance was studied for different concentrations of hydrogen in the air and relative humidity (RH) of the air. Figure 4 shows the fast drop (~ 1 s) and increase of resistance as response on turn on and off different hydrogen concentrations (100–500 ppm) in air flow at RH of 60%. Figure 5 shows the response of resistance on turn on and off different relative humidity (30–80%) in air flow with 100 ppm of hydrogen. At working temperature of 450°C, 100 ppm of hydrogen triggers more than 8-times decrease in the sensor resistance (Figs. 4 and 5). At the same time, the humidity variation does not have pronounced effect on the sensor resistance: less than 30% in the humidity range studied (Fig. 5). Fast response of the sensor to the humidity (~ 10 s) and hydrogen (~ 1 s) are observed in comparison with usual metal oxide sensors prepared by wet sol-gel processes.

Figure 4: Sensor response to different concentrations of hydrogen at RH = 60%: 1, 3, 5 and 7 – air; 2, 4 and 6 – air with 100 ppm H2. Figure 4: Sensor response to different concentrations of hydrogen at RH = 60%: 1, 3, 5 and 7 – air; 2, 4 and 6 – air with 100 ppm H2.

Click here to View figure
Figure 5: Sensor response to 100 ppm of hydrogen at different values of RH: 1 and 3 – air at RH = 80%; 2 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 80%; 4 and 6 – air at RH = 60%; 5 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 60%; 7 and 9 – air at RH = 40%; 8 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 40%; 10 and 12 – air at RH = 30%; 11 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 30%. Figure 5: Sensor response to 100 ppm of hydrogen at different values of RH: 1 and 3 – air at RH = 80%; 2 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 80%; 4 and 6 – air at RH = 60%; 5 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 60%; 7 and 9 – air at RH = 40%; 8 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 40%; 10 and 12 – air at RH = 30%; 11 – air with 100 ppm H2 at RH = 30%.

Click here to View figure

 

Conclusions

The metal oxide gas sensing material (SnO2) with a reduced sensitivity to water vapors was investigated. To decrease the concentration of OH-groups, dry synthesis based on spark ablation of tin electrodes in air atmosphere was employed. The gas sensor based on this material demonstrated very fast and stable response. The response time to the humidity and hydrogen is about 1 s which is much shorter as compared to that of traditional sensor materials prepared by wet sol-gel processes. Thus, such materials are very perspective for the development of gas sensors for the fast detection of hydrogen in industry.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project # 15-19-00190).

References

  1. Barsan, N.; Koziej, D.; Weimar, U. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 121, 18–35.
    CrossRef
  2. Fine, G. F.; Cavanagh, L. M.; Afonja, A.; Binions, R. Sensors 2010, 10, 5469–5502.
    CrossRef
  3. Wang, C.; Yin, L.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, D.; Gao, R. Sensors 2010, 10, 2088–2106.
    CrossRef
  4. Gardon, M.; Guilemany, J. M. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2012, 24, 1410–1421.
    CrossRef
  5. Efimov, A.; Sukharev, V.; Ivanov, V.; Lizunova, A. Orient. J. Chem. 2015, 31.
  6. Osipov, V. V.; Platonov, V. V.; Lisenkov, V. V. In Handbook of Nanoparticles; Aliofkhazraei, M., Ed.; Springer International Publishing, 2016; pp. 633–659.
    CrossRef
  7. Zolotko, A. N.; Poletaev, N. I.; Vovchuk, Y. I. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2015, 51, 252–268.
    CrossRef
  8. Ghorbani, H. Orient. J. Chem. 2014, 30, 1941–1949.
    CrossRef
  9. Kotov, Y. A. Nanotechnologies Russ. 2009, 4, 415–424.
    CrossRef
  10. Pfeiffer, T. V.; Feng, J.; Schmidt-Ott, A. Adv. Powder Technol. 2014, 25, 56–70.
    CrossRef
  11. Ivanov, V. V.; Efimov, A. A.; Mylnikov, D. A.; Lizunova, A. A.; Bagazeev, A. V.; Beketov, I. V.; Shcherbinin, S. V. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2016, 42, 876–878.
    CrossRef
  12. Liu, Y.; Koep, E.; Liu, M. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 3997–4000.
    CrossRef


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.