Recent Trends in the Characterization of Microbial Exopolysaccharides

Bacterial polysaccharides that are secreted into the environment are termed as exopolysaccharides (EPSs). Depending on the monosaccharide composition, EPSs can be classified into homo (HoPSs) and heteropolysaccharides (HePSs). HoPSs consist of only one type of monosaccharide, mostly glucose or fructose. In the recent years, EPSs have drawn increasing attention of the researchers worldwide, not only for their thickening, texturizing and viscosifying properties, but also for their health promoting applications. These EPSs constitute an alternative class of biothickeners, which have also been proved to have good emulsifying property, apart from their texture promoting ability in various foods. The biochemical properties of the EPSs depend on the primary structure of the EPSs. Hence it is very important to know the monomeric composition of the EPSs and their gycosidic bonds. HPLC, GC, GC-MS, NMR, Capillary electrophoresis and various bioinformatics tools can be used to determine the chemical characteristics of the EPSs.


INTRODUCTION
The polysaccharides are therapeutically potential molecules that have drawn increasing attention of the researchers in last decades due to their constructive physicochemical and biological properties.For instance, starch, pectin guar gum suppress colon cancer incidence to a significant extent (Zhao et al., 2006).Polysaccharides from microbial origin also have been reported to have potential therapeutic applications (Vincent et al., 2000).Recently, a lot of attention is being paid on the microbial exopolysaccharides (EPSs) due to their health benefits and hence, they have been treated as highly potential molecules (Patricia Ruas-Madiedo et al, 2002, De Vuyst et al 1999).Depending on the monosaccharide composition, EPSs can be classified into homo (HoPSs) and heteropolysaccharides (HePSs).HoPSs consist of only one type of monosaccharide, mostly glucose or fructose and HePSs are composed of two or more than two types of monosaccharides mostly glucose, galactose, mannose and rhamnose.In some EPSs, fucose and hexosamines like glucosamine or galactosamine can also be found in small quantities.The activity of EPS depends on the monosaccharide composition, as the primary structure of proteins (Sutherland, 1994;Cerning, 1995).Most of the researchers concentrate on HePs because of their wide variety of characteristics and biological activities.Biological activities of the EPSs depend on the composition and the monomeric linkages.Hence it is very important to characterize the EPSs chemically and biologically.Various methods that were used in the chemical characterization of the EPSs have been presented in this article.

Methodology of EPS production and characterization Media and cultural conditions
The amount of EPS production depends on many factors and varies from organism to organism, media composition and cultural conditions.Generally, microorganisms synthesize and secret EPS between their log and stationary phases and varies strain to strain used for EPS production.Lactococcus lactis ssp.Cremoris produces EPS in exponential growth phase and Lactobacillus casei secrets EPS in the early stationary phase.Many food grade bacteria including LAB and propionibacteria release acids lactic acid and propionic acid during their life cycle as a consequence of metabolism in log phase.It can be assumed that these bacteria secrete EPS to survive against acidic conditions during the growth.The probiotic LAB synthesize EPS to endure the gastric acidic conditions and also to adhere to mucosal membrane of the intestine.The production of EPS is also influenced by the oxygen, pH, temperature and media constituents in whom the organism is grown.Petry et al., 2000 observed that the three times increase (110 mg l -1 ) in EPS production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.bulgaricus under pH controlled growth than the amount obtained without pH control.The amount and mass of EPS is dependent on the type of carbon and nitrogen sources.The Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.bulgaricus NCFB 2772 produced less amount and low molecular mass EPS when used fructose in place of glucose as carbon source (Grobben et al. 1997).The carbon/nitrogen ratio plays an important role in the production amount and mass of EPS.The incorporation of complex nitrogen sources like yeast extract, peptone support the bacteria to synthesize EPS in good amounts.But, they may interfere in the quantification and composition analysis of EPS.Where culture medium has increased in complexity, additional purification steps have become necessary to reduce the protein content and other components in the final EPS preparation.The accurate amount and composition analysis can be achieved by using a chemically defined medium supplemented with nutrients like vitamins, nucleic acid bases and amino acids.The viscosity of EPSs is also an important factor because it imparts the viscosity to the nutrient medium used for the growth and production of EPS (Bouzar et al., 1995).So, thorough study of the effect of medium components is required to design large scale production of EPS using fermenter.

Isolation and quantification of EPS
The most widely used method for crude EPS preparation is precipitation with alcohol (Pham et al., 2000).Two volumes of 10 % trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is added to culture medium to precipitate proteins and kept at room temperature for 1 h.The concentration of TCA and time to keep for protein precipitation are the most important factors that affect the EPS amount.There are the chances to lose EPS If we use more concentration and time for protein precipitation because TCA also precipitates EPS at higher concentrations.The protein contaminants of EPS can be reduced by repeating the TCA a precipitation step twice or thrice.The precipitated proteins are removed by centrifugation; alcohol (95%) is added to the supernatant and kept at 4°C for overnight.The precipitated EPS is removed by centrifugation and then dialyzed vigorously against water using 12 kDa cut off membrane to remove TCA and small contaminants from EPS fraction.The dialyzed EPS is lyophilized to get dry powder which can be used for further analysis.Acetone has also been used instead of ethanol for precipitation of EPS less frequently.

Quantification
The EPS can be quantified by turbid metric and colorimetric methods.In turbid metric method, the EPS is expressed as equivalent milligrams of dextran per millimeter.This unit was defined by Gracia-Garibay and Marshal (1991) as the amount of polymer that produces same turbidity at 720 nm as one milligram of dextran (molar mass: 2 X 10 3 kDa) under the same conditions of measurements.But the accuracy this method depends on the degree of the purity of EPS and the contaminants of EPS like proteins or other molecules interfere in the turbidity and gives false results.The colorimetric methods have been widely used for quantification due to their accuracy, sensitivity and simplicity.The anthrone-sulphuric acid method is one of the colorimetric methods used for EPS quantification.Addition of EPS solution to anthrone reagent in 95% sulphuric gives a characteristic blue color which is a measure for quantitative determination of EPS (Morris, 1948) .The anthrone reagent is more expensive and solutions of it in sulphuric acid are not stable and it will not give accurate results for methylated sugars (Dubois et al., 1951).The phenolsulphuric acid method is most widely used for quantification of EPS which is based on orange yellow color produced on addition of phenol and sulphuric acid to the EPS solution (Dubois et al., 1956).However, the phenol-sulphuric acid method measures total carbohydrates present in EPS fraction including low molecular weight carbohydrates that may be present.The other most accurate method for EPS quantification is gel permeation chromatography in a HPLC system, but it is an expensive.In this method, EPS polymers and protein contents are separated based on their size and simultaneously quantified the corresponding elution peaks (Ruas-Madiedo and Gavilan, 2005)

Yield of EPS
The yield of EPS depends on organism used for production and is also influenced by many environmental factors in which the organism is grown.The reported yields of EPS from some of organisms range from 50 to 350 mg l -1 for Streptococcus thermophilus( Lavender.2001), 50 to 150 mg l -1 for Lactobacillus delbreuckii ssp.bulgaricus (Bouzar et al., 1995;Petry et al., 2000), 25 to 600 mg l -1 for Lactococcus lactis ssp.cremoris , 50 to 60 mg l -1 for Lactobacillus, 60 to 80 mg l -1 for Lactobacillus paracasei Type V casei (Cerning, 1995), 280-440 mg l -1 for Lactobacillus rhamnosus, 235 to 320 mg l -1 for Bacillus licheniformis (Larpin et al., 2002) , 110 to 330 mg l -1 for Bacillus coagulans (Kodali & Sen, 2008), 360 to 400 mg l -1 Bacillus thermoantarciticus (Manca et al., 1996).It was assumed that the EPS production characteristic by thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria is unstable due to the loss of plasmid.But, thermophilic bacteria such as S. thermophilus, Lactobacillus paracase, Lactobacillus delbreuckii do not harbor plasmid and the assumption cannot be applied for these strains and also proved that the EPS synthesis is determined by chromosomal DNA not by plasmid DNA (Germond etal., 2001).

Compositional analysis
As mentioned above, the HoPSs are composed of only one type of repeating monomer unit and HePSs are composed of two or more different types of monosaccharides.The monosaccharide composition of HePSs is strain specific, and physico-chemical properties and ability to interact with proteins depend on their composition, charge, mass, spatial arrangement, rigidity, linkages between two units and presence of side chains (Cerning. 1995).So the study of structural analysis of polymers is one of the important task before explore into their biological activities.Because of the size, molecular mass and complexity in structure, a combination of several techniques is necessary for complete structural analysis which cannot be performed by a single technique.The compositional analysis of EPSs has been widely performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC).

Acid hydrolysis
The depolymerization of EPSs by acid hydrolysis is the first step in the study of composition and also for further structural determination.Acid hydrolysis is normally done at 100°C by using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), HCl, formic acid or H 2 SO 4 .The concentration of acid, the temperature and time used for acid hydrolysis are important factors and need to be considered carefully.The high concentrations of acid may degrade the released monosaccharides from polymer and low temperatures may cause the incomplete hydrolysis of glycosidic bond between the monomers.Grobben  100°C for 6 h is widely used for acid hydrolysis of EPSs.Levander et al studied the hydrolytic efficiency of 4M HCl and 2 M TFA in different intervals and reported that 45 min in 4M HCl gave desirable hydrolysis for the release of aminosugars and more reliable results could be achieved by acid hydrolysis in TFA followed by HCl.

HPLC analysis
HPLC is can be used for both the qualitative and quantitative analysis of liberated monosaccharides after acid hydrolysis.The high pH anion exchange (HPAEC) chromatography system with a pulsed amperometric detector (PAD) is widely used for the determination of monomers in foods, beverages, dairy and biotechnological products, vegetable tissues for its simplicity, sensitivity and reliability (Arena et al., 2006).This method can be best used for strongly alkaline solutions and native carbohydrate.This system will not give accurate and reproducible results monomers derived by acid hydrolysis of polysaccharides because acid hydrolysis impart acidic environment to the solution of liberated monomers.HPLC with an ultra violet (UV) detector or refractive index (RI) is an alternative method for quantitative determination of saccharides.Due to low sensitivity and inapplicability to gradient elution, HPLC with RI detector is less commonly used (Arena et al., 2006).The next alternative approach is HPLC with UV detector which is highly sensitive and widely used for analysis and quantification of monomers.Carbohydrates do not absorb UV light and they need pre column derivatization by fluorescent tags to provide UV absorptivity at selected wavelengths.Aromatic amines (Table ) have been used as fluorescent tags for derivatizing (labeling) the reducing ends of monosaccharides to enhance the detector sensitivity.Among these, ABEE and AA have been widely reported for derivatization and separated in C 18 column under optimized chromatographic conditions (Huang et al., 2000;Tran et al., 2001, Anumula, 2006).The main drawback of the derivatization is inconsistent in yield (%) and lack of reproducibility.The advantage of the HPLC with derivatization over HPAEC-PAD is sensitivity which is femtomoles for fluorescent tags whereas picomoles for for later one (Cataldi et al., 2000).

GC analysis
GC is also an important analytical method of analysis of dissociated monosaccharide constituents of polysaccharides and has the advantages of simple instrumentation, high selectivity, quickness and high accuracy.Derivatization of monosaccharides is required due to limited volatility of sugars which renders them into volatilizable and stable derivatives (Lamari et al., 2003).The monosaccharides are either trimethylsilated or converted into alditol acetates in nonaqueous or organic solvents such as pyridine, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for compositional analysis of EPSs.Hexamethyldisilane (HMDS), Trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS), Trimethylsilyl are widely used as trimethylsilating agents that make strongly volatilizable derivatives (Xu et al., 2003;  Wang & Zhang, 2003).Alditol acetates are prepared by reduction followed by acetylation of monosaccharides.Monosaccharides are reduced with sodium borohydride in anhydrous DMSO and acetylated with 1-Methylimidazole followed by acetic anhydride.Trimethylsilyl derivatives are separated perfectly in GC with moderate polar stationary liquids, and tailing peaks appear if strong polar stationary liquids are used.However, for acetate derivatives, strong polar stationary liquids are the best choice.Both the capillary and packed columns can be used for the separation of derivatized monosaccharides.Capillary columns such as OV-1, OV-225, HP-5, SE-30, Superleco SP 2380, BPB-5 Silar 10C support-coated open tubular (SCOT) glass capillary column widely used and separated using different carriers (He, N 2 , H 2 ) and temperature programs (Wang and Fang, 2004).GC attached to mass spectrometer is an efficient and widely applicable method for linkage analysis of methylated polysaccharides.Methylation analysis is an essential step for studying the linkage pattern of sugar residues.Methylation can be performed by either dimsyl sodium/methyl iodide or sodium hydroxide/methyl iodide in which the former methylating agent is widely used (Ciucanu et al., 1984).The methylated EPSs are hydrolyzed partially and then completely.Partial hydrolysis results the cleavage of furanosidic linkages where as the complete hydrolysis results the cleavage of pyranosidic linkages.The pre-methylated EPS is partially hydrolyzed with 90% formic acid 100°C for 6 h and further hydrolyzed with 2 M TFA at 100°C for 3 h.The resulting products are subjected to reduced and acetylated to get partially methylated alditol acetates (PMAAs) and analyzed by GLC-MS and molar ratios are estimated from peak areas and the response factors (Stingele et al., 1999).Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) is another powerful technique widely used for establishment the linkage analysis and determination of pyranose/furanose form of monosaccharides (Robijn et al., 1996, Schaffer et al., 2001).Some of the polysaccharides and linkages between their monomer composition have been presented in table 2.

Capillary zone electrophoresis
The monosaccharides derivatized with UV absorbing or fluorescent molecules can be efficiently separated by capillary electrophoresis (CE) which is a novel and advantageous technique due to its ease of automation, separation efficiency and it requires small amount of sample.2-AP, PMP, ABEE have been widely used derivatizing agents for UV detection and 8-Amino-1, 3, 6-Naphthalenetrisulfonate (ANTS), 7-Nitro-2, 1, 3-Benzoxadiazole-Tagged Methylglycamine (NBD-MG) method have been commonly used for fluorescence detection (Honda et al., 2000).For CE, the monosaccharides can be derivatized by either by chemical or enzymatic reactions.Honda et al. derivatized the monosaccharides with 2-AP by reductive amination.Smith and Rassi (1992) analyzed on CE the oligosaccharides derivatized with 2-AP using coated capillary and a buffer of pH 6.In enzymatic derivatization, two enzymes have been used selectively.One is glucose oxidase which catalyzes the oxidation of glucose, and horse radish peroxidase which catalyzes the oxidation of the non-fluorescent homovanillic acid (HVA) to the fluorescent 2,29-dihydroxy-3,39-dimethoxy biphenyl-5,59-diacetic acid (HVA ) by hydrogen peroxide, produced in the first enzymic reaction.HVA can be monitored by the He/Cd line of LIF detectors.The operating buffer contains both enzymes and HVA, and the sample is introduced by pressure.Chip capillary electrophoresis (CCE) is new micro-total analysis system (µ-TAS) technique developed rapidly in recent years.In this technique separation channel, reaction container and detector are collected on a chip made by microfabrication technique (Wang and Fang, 2004).

Bioinformatics approaches in the structural analysis of glycans
Glycomics is a new field of science that deals with the identification and study of all carbohydrate molecules including structural characterization, produced by an organism.The structural characterization refers complete sugar sequence, the monosaccharide stereochemistry, the anomeric configuration and the linkage information.The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) -International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) "Nomenclature of carbohydrates" specify the three letter code to express the monosaccharide units of glycans.The ring is indicated by an italic f for furanose and p for pyranose form of monosaccharides.The interaction between glycans and proteins is crucial to biological function.The bioinformatics approaches provide information of glycan binding proteins (GBPs) so that we can identify and eliminate the disease causing reactions also design the drugs for specific targets.The ancestor of newer oligosaccharide resources is CarbBank, developed in the 1990s, which used a text-oriented IUPAC description of glycans for information retrieval.This was replaced by newer representations, such as LINUCS, used by the GLYCOSCIENCES portal, and GLYDE, an XMLbased description compliant with bioscience standards.A more intuitive approach was taken by the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes) glycome informatics team in Japan.They developed KegDraw, which produces a graphical description of glycan topology.NMR-derived structural constraints in combination with computational methods are the most frequently used techniques to investigate the dynamic behaviour of the spatial structure of complex carbohydrates.The most often used computational approaches are systematic searches where the relevant torsion angles are systematically changed and the associated energies are calculated, Metropolis Monte Carlo approaches and, increasingly, molecular dynamics simulations.The results are often presented by the 3D structure of the lowest energy conformation or as conformational maps for each glycosidic linkage indicating isoenergetic areas as a function of the torsion angles ¦ and ¨ Several data collections providing energy surfaces are available, the more extensive one, 'GlycoMapsDB'contains about 700 ¦, ¨ free energy maps obtained from high-temperature simulations of disaccharides.The well-established SWEET-II web interface uses a comprehensive collection of rather crude conformational maps to rapidly generate one realistic glycan conformation from many.The extended alphanumeric nomenclature is required as input.The generated 3D structures are mainly thought to be used as starting points for further refinement using more comprehensive computational techniques.The 'Dynamic Molecules' services the first internet portal which provides an interactive access to set up, perform and analyze molecular dynamic simulations -can take 3D structures created with SWEET-II and provides many features especially devoted to investigating and analyzing the dynamic behavior of complex carbohydrates.The interactive analysis of time dependencies of any interesting degrees of freedom, free energy conformational maps and support for the interpretation of experimental findings mainly derived from NMR spectroscopy are provided by the 'Dynamic Molecules' web interface (Saudhamini et al., .

Molecular mass determination and Purification of EPSs
The determination of molecular mass of EPS is an important study because the physicochemical and biological properties depend on the molecular mass.The molecular mass of EPSs depends on the strain used for production and monomeric composition of EPSs.Some of the EPS sources and their monomeric composition is represented in the table 1.It varies from 2.7 × 10 6 to 2.2 × 10 7 Da for strains of Streptococcus mutans, and from 1.  (Manca et al., 1996), 6 × 10 3 Da for P acidi propionici (Racine et al., 1991).Various approaches can be used to determine the mass of EPSs.Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using multiangle laser light scattering (MALLS) detector coupled with RI detector in the HPLC system is widely used method to determine the molecular mass of EPSs (Geresh et al., 2002).Elution of EPS on GPC with a specific column (Sepharose CL 4B or Sephacryl-S 400) which was precalibrated T-series standard dextrans (Sudhamani et al., 2004) or pullulans (Cho et al., 2006) (known molecular weight) is an alternative method of determination of EPS molecular weight .The molecular weight of EPSs can also be determined by using the relative viscosity (´r) of EPSs by following formula (Brigand & Denis, 1990).M • = (´r 1/6 -1) 6 /C x K As mentioned above, the protein contaminants from EPS can be reduced by repeated TCA precipitation and using chemically defined media.EPSs can be further successfully purified by DEAE cellulose chromatography and other columns have also been used for efficient purification.In some reports Sephacryl S-300, S-400, S-500, DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B have been used for purification of EPSs (Manca et al., 1996, Sudhamani et al., 2004).

Table 2 Comparison of biological activity of polysaccharides with their monomeric linkages Polysaccharide source Glycosidic linkages Bioactivity Reference
a Not reported